Multimedia News

This weekend in sports
20 photos
Venezuela's boxer Jorge Linares, left, exchan...
Holiday gift ideas: Toys, games and more
20 photos
A child holds a newly released mobile phone c...
Black Friday frenzy
20 photos
Early bird shoppers run into a Target store i...
Mumbai massacre
20 photos
A police officer watches the Taj Hotel, Mumba...
Healthy holiday recipes
20 photos
Just when you think there's nothing healthy a...

Students shocked in prank

Dec 14, 2007 12:00 AM (354 days ago) by Bill Myers, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: WASHINGTON
“I’m just appalled,” said D.C. Council Member Mary Cheh, D-Ward 3. “I just don’t understand how we can let our children be there. Obviously, they need to be rescued.”
(Andrew Harnik/Examiner)
“I’m just appalled,” said D.C. Council Member Mary Cheh, D-Ward 3. “I just don’t understand how we can let our children be there. Obviously, they need to be rescued.”
WASHINGTON (Map, News) - Three students at a controversial Massachusetts clinic where D.C. special education students have been farmed out for years were mistakenly subjected to electric shock treatments as part of a prank, The Examiner has learned.

The episode is part of a state criminal investigation focused on the Judge Rotenberg Center, said officials close to the case. Nine D.C. students are housed at the clinic, to the distress of some city officials.

“I’m just appalled,” said D.C. Council Member Mary Cheh, D-Ward 3. “I just don’t understand how we can let our children be there. Obviously, they need to be rescued.

“I feel like driving up there myself,” Cheh added.

This story continues below
Advertisement

The Massachusetts investigation began in late August, after a student at the center called staff and pretended to be center founder Matthew Israel, investigative documents show.

The pretender told staff that he wanted the three wards, one of them a child from Virginia, hooked up to electrodes. One of the students was shocked 29 times. The other two were shocked 77 times each, documents show and sources said.

The sessions were videotaped and the videos were viewed by a state investigator, but Rotenberg officials have since destroyed the tapes, sources said.

Nancy Alterio, executive director of the Massachusetts Disabled Persons Protection, told The Examiner that her agency had investigated the claims and its report was expected within weeks.

Center spokesman Ernest Corrigan declined comment.

Rotenberg is one of hundreds of special education vendors paid hundreds of millions of dollars to look after D.C.’s most vulnerable children. It has been the subject of dozens of complaints in Massachusetts for years, from allegations of sexual abuse to assault, documents show.

The Examiner reported last week that city officials continued sending children to the center weeks after Schools Chancellor Michelle Rhee ordered Rotenberg cut off the city’s approved vendors list.

The nine children left at the center have told D.C. officials they want to come home, school documents obtained by The Examiner show, but their way is blocked by a combination of desperate parents — who believe the center is the last hope for their troubled kids — and bureaucratic incompetence.

State Superintendent Deborah A. Gist has hired a team of outside investigators to examine special education vendors, including Rotenberg.

Got a tip on the special education system? Call Bill Myers at 202-459-4956 or send e-mail to bmyers@dcexaminer.com.

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

11:55 AM MST on Mon., Mar. 10, 2008 re: "Council: No more shock therapy for D.C. special education youth"

Examiner Reader said:
I commend DC officials for the continued efforts to remove students from JRC. However, I also want to encourage them to set a complete example by developing an in district program that meets the needs of these children. It is not enough to ONLY condemn these practices, you also need to actually demonstrate best practices. The unfulfilled needs and associated problems of these children will not just magically disappear without a plan that is founded upon proven methods. DC, you have proven that you have the fortitude to deal with half of the overall issue. Now reveal your action plan for the remaining 50%.

1 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

9:00 AM MST on Wed., Mar. 5, 2008 re: "Parents stymie efforts to pull kids from clinic"

Mike Licht said:
GAB -- I agree that there are types of aversion therapy that are effective; they do not involve electrical shock or other pain-generating techniques. My concern is that current media coverage -- especially the careless headline editing of this publication -- results in the public confusing the pain-torture practices of JRC with ECT, a hospital-administered therapy of proven value, especially with contemporary techniques.

1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:31 AM MST on Thu., Jan. 24, 2008 re: "Teen shocked 24 times in practical joke at Mass. clinic"

DCPS Employee said:
I work in the school system, and have spoken with parents who have children at JRC. Unbelievably, the parents, even when informed of the conditions in JRC, state they already know about the school, that their children have shown improved behavior, and if their children are removed from the school, they will consider lawsuits against DCPS. Also, the "Advocates", and "Attorneys" who reccomend these schools to the parents should be held accountable. They are milking money out of DCPS that could be used to build and create better programs and facilities for our kids. It is a shame that we as a school system send our kids away to meet thier needs. In order for a child to be placed out of state, parents and advocates file lawsuits against the District and file petitions to have DCPS pay for these facilities, regardless of what type of facility it is. Usually, because of lackluster service, the attorneys win. This is a sad case and I am glad that light has been shed on this.

61 agree | 55 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:49 AM MST on Thu., Jan. 24, 2008 re: "Teen shocked 24 times in practical joke at Mass. clinic"

GAB said:
Mike Licht - I wouldn't say aversion therapy has dubious value. It has been effective in preventing specific behaviors known to be harmful to a person. I do agree that it should be used rarely, and never to condition a person out of mere likes and dislikes.

42 agree | 56 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:06 PM MST on Wed., Jan. 9, 2008 re: "D.C. teen kept a ward of shock clinic for months by Massachusetts court"

Mike Banks said:
A question for critics of JRC in this and other blogs: Where were you when many of these students were kept in psychiatric hospitals, heavily medicated, for months, because neither the public schools, nor any other private program would accept them? Where were you when one current JRC student detached both her retinas, despite all of the "state of the art" medications and treatments her parents could find, prior to admission to JRC, where her behaviors were finally controlled, and some sight restored? Where will you be if JRC's treatment is banned, and these students and their families are once again on their own? It is very easy to self righteously rant on a blog. How about instead starting a school which guarantees to accept and treat, without aversives, all students rejected and/or expelled by all of the the so-called positive-only programs. I've read over and over on these blogs how easy it is. Why haven't any of you done it yet? It is always easier to condemn than to produ

62 agree | 80 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:07 AM MST on Thu., Dec. 27, 2007 re: "City threatens school's funds"

Mike Licht said:
Please call the treatment Aversive or Aversion Therapy. Shock Treatment is the common name for ECT, Electro-Convulsion Therapy, proven effective hospital treatment for many disorders. Aversion Therapy is a questionable Skinnerian Behavioral enterprise of dubious value.

84 agree | 75 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:38 AM MST on Thu., Dec. 27, 2007 re: "City threatens school's funds"

Joe Jena said:
These democrats who run most of the school systems don't mind torturing children but when it comes to torturing terrorists, that's not right. What hypocrites!

82 agree | 84 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:53 AM MST on Thu., Dec. 27, 2007 re: "City threatens school's funds"

Sierra said:
For our deranged PC society that won't let kids run around and sweat for Godsakes is this acceptable? The PC's wouldn't let it be used on a terrorist but it's ok for children with disabilities? Folks, something is just way out of kilter here. Plus the cost to the taxpayers of DC having to pay for it?

87 agree | 88 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:04 PM MST on Mon., Dec. 24, 2007 re: "Therapists petition for no electroshock"

Examiner Reader said:
Nearly 15 years ago when I worked in disability rights in Michigan, we loudly protested the use of public funds to send a special education student to this chamber of horrors to be tortured with shock, ammonia sprays and more. It is outrageous that Massachusetts continues to condone these criminal acts against children...acts not allowed in our country's prisons, and banned by the Geneva Convention. We have known for many years that there are proven, humane ways to accomplish behavior change, and that Mr. Israel's apparent addiction to torture is both unnecessary and unconscionable. This institution has been allowed to continue inflicting its horrors on our nation's most vulnerable children in spite of the loud, prolonged outcry by professionals in the fields of disabilities and human rights, and the heroic efforts of previous DMR administrators in Massachusetts, I can only wonder if someone behind the scenes has been paying people off. JRC is a national disgrace and must be closed

67 agree | 59 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:32 AM MST on Sun., Dec. 23, 2007 re: "Aide: Kids will leave shock-therapy clinic"

Examiner Reader said:
I think we need to hear from recent/current staff. I worked at the center (BRI back then) 24 yrs ago before shock therapy. The school's success stories were few and far between. The students became robots afraid to do *anything* The behavior plans focused on changing too many behaviors at one time. It was confusing to the students ant the ever changing staff (I was often assigned to a classroom or residence where I did not know the students or their behavioral issues/ plans) Visitors never saw the program in action. An announcement was made "We are on visitors" and all punishing stopped. The students knew it and would act out. Consistency (most important in any behavioral therapy) was interrupted. The picture perfect designer group homes were laughable! Arriving for a shift, the furniture would have to be removed and rearranged (glass coffee tables and mirrored panels in a residence where children would bang their heads against them?) I can wonder if these things have changed!

83 agree | 91 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:58 AM MST on Thu., Dec. 20, 2007 re: "Therapists petition for no electroshock"

Angela Spino said:
I made an appt for a tour at JRC acting as if I was going to place my son with autism there.I spent over 4 1/2 hours at the school and visited every classroom and/or room with a door.I saw kids and adults of all ages and witnessed some kids receiving what JRC call's the "application" we call it being shocked.I commented on Mother Jones Blog and they wrote my quote in last month's edition/I also had a Long Island reporter quote my experience to JRC in the Long island Business News in Sept along with an article on Ken Mollins. It is hard to fathom that this place has been in operation for over 35 years.Since JRC has CT listed as having individuals with disabilities there...i personally wrote a letter of FOIA to DCF, DDS(formerly DMR) and all the Superintendents in CT to see where all of our children are (in other states/facilities)and to see who is signing the checks for JRC...so far there are 2 ppl there that were placed by their parents and funded by DDS (both adults)who visits th??

84 agree | 68 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:14 AM MST on Wed., Dec. 19, 2007 re: "Therapists petition for no electroshock"

Derrick Jeffries said:
One commenter mentioned that we "have had no reply from the APA." I have actually had several email exchanges with Dr. Bufka regarding the petition. He has assured me that the petition has been distributed to the appropriate committees. I do appreciate the fact that he openly communicates with me. ABA International has NEVER responded to my communications with them. They are the group that approves the use of electric shock. Please go to their website and click on the tab for "Behavior Analysis" near the top of the page. Then click on #12. Those who approve of the use of ABA should be aware of this reality. ABA has welcomed Dr. Israel to their national meetings where he has given presentations about JRC aversives. They have also toured his facility and have even seen the room where students are strapped hand and foot and severely shocked 4 or 5 times at random over a 40 minute period. If any of you believe that ABA has departed from approving aversives; think again.

66 agree | 65 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:09 PM MST on Tue., Dec. 18, 2007 re: "Therapists petition for no electroshock"

Examiner Reader said:
To the poster below - I agree with you. I don't think anyone is blaming the parents here. Rotenberg is a ONE OFF school in the way it abuses children and so clearly is not an 'answer', but to desperate parents who are unaware of, and unable to access, successful centers that do NOT abuse children, then it may be seen as the only possible answer. That is the fault of Matthew Israel and the staff that no doubt will try pleading that they were 'only following orders'.

74 agree | 69 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:13 PM MST on Tue., Dec. 18, 2007 re: "Therapists petition for no electroshock"

Examiner Reader said:
I'm concerned that some respondents are thinking that the children at JRC are simply in need of "discipline." That is not the case. While the "students" at JRC have severe behavior problems (beating themselves to a pulp, for example), the real point is that NO ONE SHOULD BE TREATED LIKE THIS, especially people who are even more vulnerable because of their disabilities. I applaud this article and wish more journalists were incensed enough to write about it and I hope everyone is as willing to cover the less glamorous but still important news about humane positive behavior supports as alternatives to shock, water spray, and all the other awful things JRC uses AND about how our nation should be ashamed that families are not given the supports they need when they have children with these types of behavior challenges so that they feel they have no more options left.

76 agree | 69 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:51 PM MST on Tue., Dec. 18, 2007 re: "Aide: Kids will leave shock-therapy clinic"

Examiner Reader said:
Mr Israel. What have you achieved during your life to make the lives of other lives better? What footprint of kindness and love have you ever left in those children you have had control over? WHAT HAVE YOU DONE?

91 agree | 87 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:16 PM MST on Tue., Dec. 18, 2007 re: "Therapists petition for no electroshock"

Phyllis from Florida said:
This kind of treatment to children with disabilities must stop! I am shocked that such barbaric and outdated treatments are still being used in 2007.

72 agree | 52 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:51 AM MST on Tue., Dec. 18, 2007 re: "Therapists petition for no electroshock"

Jack Tanis said:
Aversion "therapy", including electroshock, was discredited long ago. More importantly, the end does not justifies the means. Every evil deed committed in human history relied upon the contrary, i.e., that the end does justify the means. The APA ought be dedicated to infusing the human condition with humanity, not complacently tolerating "Manchurian Candidate" treatments simply because they are expedient. Shame on the proponents and administrators of this re-VOLT-ing practise.

86 agree | 56 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:08 AM MST on Tue., Dec. 18, 2007 re: "Therapists petition for no electroshock"

Examiner Reader said:
I am in agreement with this article. Elctroschock should be BANNED.

59 agree | 54 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:39 AM MST on Tue., Dec. 18, 2007 re: "Therapists petition for no electroshock"

Examiner Reader from CT said:
How many children/former "patients"/parents need to band together to form a class action lawsuit against not only JRC but the State of Mass. for providing nothing short of torture to CHILDREN that are not able to speak for themselves. Electroshock has NO place in the care and therapeutic services for a CHILD. Period. How incredibly sad for all of those affected. Ban electroshock on kids NOW.

63 agree | 63 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:47 AM MST on Tue., Dec. 18, 2007 re: "Students sent to troubled Mass. school"

Examiner Reader said:
From the article I gather D.C.has a $210 million-plus special education system. Why do they not spend the sort of money they have so far spent on JRC on setting up a Center run under the auspices of someone who sees these children as feeling, vulnerable human beings and treats them accordingly ?

101 agree | 90 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:41 AM MST on Tue., Dec. 18, 2007 re: "Therapists petition for no electroshock"

Examiner Reader said:
A very worrying aspect stands out in that Derrick Jeffries and Nancy Weiss have had no reply from the APA. How appalling. At worst this indicates that the American Psychological Association condone cruelty despite their more recent declarations, and at best it implies an apathy on their part to do anything to make changes which, in effect, amounts to the same thing.

61 agree | 71 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:27 AM MST on Tue., Dec. 18, 2007 re: "Students shocked in prank"

Examiner Reader said:
"...The nine children left at the center have told D.C. officials they want to come home, school documents obtained by The Examiner show, but their way is blocked by a combination of desperate parents — who believe the center is the last hope for their troubled kids — and bureaucratic incompetence..." What a very sad state of affairs for the CHILDREN. I hope good places are soon found for them in an environment which breeds love, warmth, kindness and support and that this will help to heal them from the terrible emotional wounds inflicted on them to date. All children need love, particularly those who have suffered at the hands of the adults they have had no choice but to rely upon.

79 agree | 66 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:32 AM MST on Tue., Dec. 18, 2007 re: "Aide: Kids will leave shock-therapy clinic"

Examiner Reader said:
If you bring a child / student up where the electric shocking of children is perfectly acceptable behaviour, then it doesn't take a psychologist to work out that those children / students who observe and experiencing continuous painful physical and mental abuse, will reflect that environment in their own behaviour. In the case of the student in question this reflection is seen in a 'prank' call mimicking the orders of the person who controls the lives of all those in there including that of the student. If there is any justice to be shown, then the criminal investigation should be into the actions of Matthew Israel, a) for his cruel and unusual treatment of children and b) for deeply instilling into them that inflicting pain on others is an acceptable way to behave.

85 agree | 81 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:45 AM MST on Tue., Dec. 18, 2007 re: "Aide: Kids will leave shock-therapy clinic"

Examiner Reader said:
"The Examiner reported last week that Massachusetts officials have opened a criminal investigation after a Rotenberg student made a prank phone call and ordered three of his fellows hooked up to electric-shock machines. Two of the students were shocked at least 77 times, state documents show." Who are they instigating a criminal investigation about? The student who made the 'prank call' or the Centre for administrating those shocks? The shocks were only possible because the Judge Rotenberg Center believes in treating children that way.

81 agree | 92 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:40 AM MST on Tue., Dec. 18, 2007 re: "Therapists petition for no electroshock"

Derrick Jeffries said:
It seems as though I cannot post an email address or a link to a website. If anyone wants to read the petition, please type the keywords, "American Psychological Association Autism Petition," without the quotes into a google search engine. The first website/blog that pops up should be the one you want. The email address you need to use for signing onto the petition is included in the letter itself. I can also send you a copy of the petition with the current list of signers upon your request. Bill, thank you for writing this important article. I do not suffer from Asperger's Syndrome, but a few associated symptoms create some challenges. The real sufferers are those children and young adults at the JRC who live in constant pain and fear as a result of oppression disguised as "effective treatment." Oppression always seems effective to those who abuse power. The oppressed have a different opinion. Unfortunately, they may have limited ability to speak it.

70 agree | 61 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:59 AM MST on Tue., Dec. 18, 2007 re: "Students sent to troubled Mass. school"

Examiner Reader, UK said:
Thank you for writing this article. It is unbelievable that in the United States in the 21st Century this kind of barbaric torture is allowed on children, any children, whether Asbergers or not. Just what kind of human beings think this kind of thing up, what kind of people allow those thoughts to be put into practice, and what kind of justice fails to investigate and act to protect the children?

103 agree | 72 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:44 PM MST on Mon., Dec. 17, 2007 re: "Therapists petition for no electroshock"

Dorothy Lerner said:
The Judge Rotten-berg Center should immediately be shut down and its students should be placed in facilities supporting individuals on the autism spectrum with respect, dignity, and humanity. This torture mill is a very black mark on the state of Massachusetts and the United States. There is absolutely no scientifically and evidence based research that validates this hideous institution ... unless, of course, the research has been conducted by researchers affiliated with this hell-hole. Even in the realm of the helping professions, there are those vile creatures who pose as do-gooders, when, in fact, they are only interested in keeping their own pockets filled to capacity. Why isn't the Governor of Massachusetts ordering JRC permanently closed?

99 agree | 73 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:56 PM MST on Mon., Dec. 17, 2007 re: "Therapists petition for no electroshock"

Mike R. said:
Umm. My comments are being posted incorrectly, it'd be great when JRC is shut down for the barbaric use of torture against individuals with disabilities. most of which the us taxpayer is funding. two students have died there at least. End JRC!

71 agree | 72 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:53 PM MST on Mon., Dec. 17, 2007 re: "Therapists petition for no electroshock"

Mike R. said:
Two deaths, NOT three...typo.

99 agree | 78 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:51 PM MST on Mon., Dec. 17, 2007 re: "Therapists petition for no electroshock"

Mike R. said:
As an individual with a degree in disability studies, journalism and multimedia, I'd love to interview Dr. Isreal, because, I figure my interview could be used to indict him for hate crimes against people with disabilities. For the brainwashed parents of students of JRC, save your kids now and get them out - or else they probably will never forgive you. Dr. Isreal has had three students die in his school, all with the "theraputic" defense of electroshock therapy. JRC=Torture in my opinion, but then again, i'm disabled, what do i know. I did think Dr Israel looked like a deer in the headlights in the only interview he gave with CNN without his brainwashed parents bullying journalists around. Sit down with John Hockenberry, Dr. Israel, c'mon, tell us why we "morons" who believe in humane treatment dont understand about your treatments...

66 agree | 68 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:17 PM MST on Mon., Dec. 17, 2007 re: "Therapists petition for no electroshock"

K. Morrell said:
I'm surprised that this issue has not been resolved. When we witnessed soldiers invoking inhumane conditions upon our enemy, they were swiftly and harshly prosecuted. How is electro-shock treatment allowed on any person in the United States - as a citizen of, as a resident of and more to the point as someone NOT an enemy to this country. It amazes me that it is taking so much to get this petition not only recognized but swiftly adopted, passed, and or legally regarded as law. Do we not value all of our citizens of the USA? It is all of us that makes up this great country. Let's get our stuff together people and stop the abuse and take care of this, shall we??!!?

114 agree | 78 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:47 PM MST on Mon., Dec. 17, 2007 re: "Students sent to troubled Mass. school"

Reader said:
If a parent directly inflicts the kind of pain JRC inflicts on children, we can indeed intercede to protect that child. What difference is there when it's done by proxy? This "oh gosh, we can't get between parent and child" line is sheer nonsense. And once JRC is closed we may want to know just who failed these children all these years and why.

124 agree | 101 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:32 PM MST on Mon., Dec. 17, 2007 re: "Therapists petition for no electroshock"

Ray Gerke said:
As advocate and a individual with CP, I find the treatment at Judge Rotenberg Center Educational Center unbelivable. I live in a instition for awhile and I thought some of the things that happen to me there was bad. I am glad that being shock was 1 of them. The Center needs to be shut down at once,

91 agree | 74 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:42 PM MST on Mon., Dec. 17, 2007 re: "Therapists petition for no electroshock"

Examiner Reader said:
The fact that this treatment can even be considered as appropriate in light of the Abu Graib prison and its fresh pictures of electric wires connected to a hooded human form is shocking. This publicly-funded treatment of patients with electric shock is something from the dark ages. Why not thumb screws too? Someone needs to step in and follw the money trail connecting Israel et al with the manufacturers of these torture devices.

111 agree | 83 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:23 PM MST on Mon., Dec. 17, 2007 re: "Therapists petition for no electroshock"

Bonnie from NY said:
I totally agree. There are positive and thoughtful ways to address difficult behaviors. Also, even though aversives may halt the target behavior, there is little to no lasting effect, according to the research. On the other hand, approaches that use positive means teach alternatives that the student internalizes, again according to much research that has been done. The JRC is 'way out of whack on this and other issues. Other homes and schools should be found for every child there, in my opinion.

108 agree | 80 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:28 PM MST on Mon., Dec. 17, 2007 re: "Therapists petition for no electroshock"

Examiner Reader said:
Electric Shock Treatment should not be used on anyone. Our bodies run on a natural current and when we interfere with mother natural all _ _ _ _ breaks loose.

123 agree | 81 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:23 PM MST on Mon., Dec. 17, 2007 re: "Gray blasts use of special ed. school"

Ettina said:
I agree that many of the JRC students have serious problems. But there are things that are worse than doing nothing, and the JRC falls under that category in my opinion. I do not approve of using seriously painful aversives even for the most severe self injury or aggression. Besides, has it even been proven effective? I don't understand how a child who chooses to hurt themselves can be stopped by a painful aversive.

105 agree | 110 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:19 PM MST on Mon., Dec. 17, 2007 re: "Therapists petition for no electroshock"

Janice S. MS Ed said:
I have been working with individuals who are Autistic for 30 years. Anyone who is being violent is seriously being misunderstood. I can be a very strict teacher and demand a lot from my students, but torture is never acceptable. I have to ask if Sensory Integration Issues are thoroughly explored. Are people given the respect to choose NOT to do certain activities. I have worked in residential care. I have worked with people who are violent. Torture is never an educational approach. Prisoners of War will learn to do as they are told to avoid torture. The Cultural Revolution was marketed as Re-education. I understand the desperation of parents struggling with a violent child. I have raised an Autistic child. That doesn't make torture the answer.

104 agree | 74 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:13 PM MST on Mon., Dec. 17, 2007 re: "Therapists petition for no electroshock"

Ken Mollins said:
I am the attorney in NY who has brought suit against the center for abuse and alleged torture of children. This center uses a device called the GED to shock children for reasons they deem approriate. However the law only allow use of avesives to prevent injury to a student or another. The device has been used when a little child says No or if a child does not hear a directive and ignores the instructor. These reasons are not supported by anyone other than the director of the center (Dr. Israel) and are opposed as corporal punishment by most recognized psychological associations. In additio, the school has billed the Commonwealth of Mass. hundreds of thousands of dollars inappropriatly as has been determined by their Inspector General and has been fined for calling clinicians as psychologists in violation of Mass law. Children are tied down with their hands strapped above their heads and are shocked for hours at a time long after whatever they have done is forgotten. More to tell

117 agree | 76 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:44 PM MST on Mon., Dec. 17, 2007 re: "Students sent to troubled Mass. school"

Examiner Reader said:
The JRC should be banned. "Needed discipline??" Is that what autism is -- just a discipline problem?? No. It is the problem of society when it views individuals as worthless, or that criminalizes them because they do not work and seek to understand. No one deserves to be tortured or disciplined. This is incarceration. Even if the parents put them there.

126 agree | 90 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:43 PM MST on Mon., Dec. 17, 2007 re: "Therapists petition for no electroshock"

Alison Hymes said:
In whose universe is this not torture? The fact that some parents allow this to happen to their children is grounds for having them investigated by CPS, not grounds for allowing it to continue in the US of A. We don't torture children. Shocks for nagging, shocks for talking, shocks for being messy? How is any of this anything but cruel and unusual punishment? We don't use electric chairs to execute murderers anymore but we are going to let this place use shocks over and over on children and teens with disabilities? Because their parents say so? Their parents need parenting classes or a course in empathy or maybe just to lose their children and let someone capable of empathy take care of them. This so called school needs to close down. How is it that hundreds of residential programs for kids with severe disabilities manage to operate without shocking kids and this place can not?

99 agree | 74 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:31 PM MST on Mon., Dec. 17, 2007 re: "Therapists petition for no electroshock"

Examiner Reader said:
I wish you hadn't called him a 'sufferer' of Asperger Syndrome - the only suffering caused by AS is when people like the guys in the JRC get involved. Apart from that, this is a great article.

123 agree | 83 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:43 AM MST on Mon., Dec. 17, 2007 re: "Fenty aide says kids will be out of shock-therapy clinic"

Joe Jena said:
The electro-shock should be used on the staff who works in the tax office.

121 agree | 98 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:08 PM MST on Fri., Dec. 14, 2007 re: "Students shocked in prank"

Examiner Reader said:
WHERE IS FENTY AND RHEE on this scandal? Rhee: find alternative placement for this handful of DC kids imprisoned in that facility. Then Fenty: issue an executive order remanding the children to the new placement.

122 agree | 115 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:43 AM MST on Fri., Dec. 14, 2007 re: "Students shocked in prank"

Ind. Presidential Candidate - MiddleClass2008.com said:
"after a student at the center called staff and pretended to be center founder Matthew Israel" - Just how stupid are these people? Apparently they are INCREDIBLY stupid.

95 agree | 115 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:10 AM MST on Fri., Dec. 14, 2007 re: "Mass. clinic students shocked in prank"

Examiner Reader said:
I am offended by the comments of Mary Cheh, ie., that the children need to be rescued. Rescued by who? The children at the school have parents who fought to get them placed at JRC and if the parents want them out, they can leave. Guess what hasn't happend??? The parents haven't taken any steps to remove the students. This article and topic is shamelessly slanted to continue shining a negative light on DCPS. Oh, and other than making comments, what has Mary Cheh (Ward 3) done?? I bet she hasn't personally spoken to any parent whose child child is at JRC to get their perspective. . . . This is all political theatre!!

108 agree | 125 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:19 AM MST on Tue., Dec. 11, 2007 re: "Students sent to troubled Mass. school"

Examiner Reader said:
JRC spends a lot of resourses courting school administrators. Someone should check out the money.

110 agree | 95 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:37 PM MST on Mon., Dec. 10, 2007 re: "Students sent to troubled Mass. school"

Brian said:
I agree with Dr Israel and what he does for the few children with such a severe form of autism. JRC is not for all children with this affliction, only the ones who have tried all other treatment options with no success. What they do at JRC helps greatly improve the quality of life for those who need it. For those who say it must be bad because it's the only school in the country to use G.E.D therapy is not looking at the whole picture. Would you rather the number of children with this severe form of autism increase to support 2, 3 or 100 schools like JRC, then it would be acceptable treatment? I’m thankful we only need one school like JRC at this time.

113 agree | 112 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:39 AM MST on Mon., Dec. 10, 2007 re: "Students sent to troubled Mass. school"

Examiner Reader said:
Perhaps for the first time in their lives these children are receiving some needed discipline. I think the program should continue.

117 agree | 100 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:55 AM MST on Mon., Dec. 10, 2007 re: "Students sent to troubled Mass. school despite Rhee’s stop order, e-mails show"

Examiner Reader said:
If you did some research on this topic instead of making assumptions and conjecture, this article would be news. Instead, this article is replete with erroneous statements and "flat out" lies. I guess that makes good paper.

110 agree | 123 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement