Multimedia News

World AIDS Day: Observing a global epidemic
20 photos
Children from the Andile School choir sing du...
This weekend in sports
20 photos
Venezuela's boxer Jorge Linares, left, exchan...
Holiday gift ideas: Toys, games and more
20 photos
A child holds a newly released mobile phone c...
Black Friday frenzy
20 photos
Early bird shoppers run into a Target store i...
Mumbai massacre
20 photos
A police officer watches the Taj Hotel, Mumba...

Waterfront-housing boom lands in Redwood City

Dec 11, 2007 3:00 AM (357 days ago) by Beth Winegarner, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: REDWOOD CITY, Calif.
REDWOOD CITY, Calif. (Map, News) - Two major projects that would bring upwards of 900 new town houses to the city’s waterfront could win approval this month, though some in the city maintain that housing does not belong near the Bay.

Peninsula Park, a scaled-down rendition of the high-rise Marina Shores Village project overturned by voters in 2004, includes a plan to build 796 town houses, 10,000 square feet of retail space and a 200-room hotel near Pete’s Harbor, located a mile east from the Whipple Avenue exit.

Its developers have agreed to provide 40 affordable units, funding for a Redwood Creek bridge crossing, a child care center and a public park, in a contract the Planning Commission will vote on tonight. The City Council is slated to vote on the entire proposal, including the developer agreement, Monday.

Opponents said Marina Shores Village, which was planned to include 1,930 condominiums in buildings 17 stories tall, was simply too big and dense — and lambasted the city at the time of the proposal for not inviting more public input.

This story continues below
Advertisement

“We got a number of comments this time from people saying they were more pleased with the outreach, and felt that their comments were reflected in the plan,” city planner Blake Lyon said. “Some who opposed Marina Shores Village have come out in support of Peninsula Park.”

The Friends of Redwood City, which masterminded the Marina Shores referendum, will not overturn Peninsula Park if it’s approved, member Ralph Nobles said.

However, “I think it’s the wrong place for a housing development. It’s not transit-oriented and the traffic situation here is terrible,” Nobles said.

Meanwhile, the Preserve at Redwood Shores, a plan to construct 144 to 158 town houses, a new elementary school and more than 90 acres of restored wetlands in Redwood Shores, goes to the Planning Commission for a vote Dec. 18. If approved, the project from developer Max Keech could go before the City Council in January, planner Tom Passanisi said.

Early on, opponents argued that town houses on the site would threaten wildlife. Now, residents are seeking assurances that the city will not use its new recycled-water pipeline to irrigate the K-8 school planned for the property.

Redwood City water experts have asserted that the recycled water, which comes from treated wastewater, is safe for contact, even with kids.

“The City Council adopted a policy in 2004 that recycled water would not be used in schools, parks or playgrounds,” resident Christina Lai said. “We want the Planning Commission to indicate whether recycled water will be used or not at our new school and park.”

bwinegarner@examiner.com

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

5:42 PM MST on Tue., Jan. 15, 2008 re: "Waterfront-housing boom lands in Redwood City"

Paul Furman said:
I for one will never visit Redwood City's downtown again. I made a trip there & spent $225 at a local store & my thanks from the town was a $200 ticket for changing lanes in a trap where they hand out hundreds of tickets over at least the past year. Paul Furman, San Francisco

52 agree | 42 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Advertisement