Multimedia News

World AIDS Day: Observing a global epidemic
20 photos
Children from the Andile School choir sing du...
This weekend in sports
20 photos
Venezuela's boxer Jorge Linares, left, exchan...
Holiday gift ideas: Toys, games and more
20 photos
A child holds a newly released mobile phone c...
Black Friday frenzy
20 photos
Early bird shoppers run into a Target store i...
Mumbai massacre
20 photos
A police officer watches the Taj Hotel, Mumba...

Background checks for D.C. employees

Dec 10, 2007 12:00 AM (358 days ago) by Michael Neibauer, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: WASHINGTON
D.C. Government employees listen to a speech by Mayor Adrian Fenty in this undated file photo. Most D.C. government and public school employees whose jobs entail direct contact with children will have to undergo criminal background checks.
(Examiner file photo)
D.C. Government employees listen to a speech by Mayor Adrian Fenty in this undated file photo. Most D.C. government and public school employees whose jobs entail direct contact with children will have to undergo criminal background checks.
WASHINGTON (Map, News) - Most D.C. government and public school employees whose jobs entail direct contact with children will have to undergo criminal background checks no matter when they were first hired, under new rules published Friday.

The emergency regulations issued by the Department of Human Resources will take effect in 30 days and could affect as many as 15,000 city workers. They require that each current employee or unsupervised volunteer in a covered position “be subjected to an initial criminal background check” within 45 days of the rules’ implementation, and then to submit to periodic checks at least every two years.

“These rules will maximize the safety of the children of the District of Columbia,” DCHR spokesman Mike Rupert said in an e-mail. “Once finalized, these new rules will allow the District to scrutinize the backgrounds of all employees in safety sensitive positions — especially those who work with or around children.”

Laws in place since 2005 require background checks for job applicants and child service providers, but never before has the city delved into the pasts of longtime staffers who have direct contact with youth. Employees with more than a dozen agencies and divisions could be affected, including human services, public schools, health, parks and recreation, mental health, child and family services, disability services, and the fire prevention bureau.

This story continues below
Advertisement

The exact positions to require checks are to be determined, but the number of employees affected could top out at nearly 15,000 — 2,400 in the executive and 12,000 or more in the schools.

The criminal checks, the costs of which will be absorbed by the District, include fingerprinting and reviews of national crime databases. The results “shall not immediately disqualify or create a presumption against employment or volunteer status,” according to the regulations, unless that person is found to have abused children.

Mafara Hobson, DCPS spokeswoman, said every person who works for the school system is fingerprinted and has his or her background checked, though she could not say whether longtime employees have undergone the inquiries.

Union leaders said they weren’t aware of the new rules. One said the plan appeared to cast an unprecedented wide net.

mneibauer@dcexaminer.com

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

5:02 AM MST on Tue., Dec. 11, 2007 re: "Background checks for D.C. employees"

Check the checker said:
Background checks and job reference checks go hand-in-hand. You might have a perfect police clearance but have the scruples of unworthy employee, yet the supervisor will give a glowing reference to rid that employee. Again, who will check the checker?

56 agree | 59 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

5:01 PM MST on Mon., Dec. 10, 2007 re: "Background checks for D.C. employees"

defense for the defenseless said:
I would like to have them answer "WHO" is going to actually do these so called checks. Let's hope they implement/hire trained staff that can be neutral.

48 agree | 52 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:53 PM MST on Mon., Dec. 10, 2007 re: "Background checks for D.C. employees"

Examiner Reader said:
These checks should be independent of HR and DCPS should have absolutely nothing to do with them. The volunteer background checks for DCPS volunteers fell by the wayside years ago; who knows who is in contact with the children? And, with the way teachers transfer in and out of school districts, it is easy to hide a criminal past. This is long overdue!

56 agree | 56 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:13 AM MST on Mon., Dec. 10, 2007 re: "Background checks for D.C. employees"

defense for the defenseless said:
This is good news but what does "DIRECT CONTACT" mean, our janitors and cafeteria staff have direct contact, lets hope they will be subjected to the same background checks. Concern over this being done by Human Resources is another issue, they want a BODY they need trained staff to enusure a GOOD BODY is placed in our DC School System.

42 agree | 50 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:41 AM MST on Mon., Dec. 10, 2007 re: "Background checks for D.C. employees"

defense for the defenseless said:
Finally, individuals exposed to our children will undergo background checks as well as periodic checks. It's nice that they will "UNDERGO" these checks but now the next step of resolving the issues and getting rid of the individuals that should not be working would be great. What defines "DIRECT CONTACT" with the children, the janitors have director contact and so do the cafeteria staff I would hope they also conduct indepth checks on these indviduals as well. They can do as much harm to our children as the teachers/volunteers, etc. Criminal checks are a great resource and while each case must be handled on it's own merits this is going to take tons of work and QUALIFIED staff to do this job. My concern is that this is conducted out of HUMAN RESOURCES, traditionally Human Resources Staff want a body to meet requirements so they tend to overlook issues in which they should address.

45 agree | 44 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement