Multimedia News

Sexiest older women. How old are they?
20 photos
Actress Kate Walsh poses for pictures after l...
Beautiful people in Cannes
20 photos
Australian actress Diana Glenn poses for phot...
Celebs out and about
18 photos
Actress Lindsay Lohan arrives at the Diesel x...
NFL Sunday
20 photos
New York Jets quarterback Brett Favre passes ...
The best of college football
20 photos
Miami's Graig Cooper scores a touchdown as Ce...

Lawmakers seek oil spill legislation, independent review

Dec 6, 2007 4:29 PM (312 days ago) by News Reports, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: SAN FRANCISCO
Against a backdrop of flying sparks from repairs on the container ship Cosco Busan, a Bay Area delegation of state assemblymembers in San Francisco pledged to introduce legislation aimed at improving a 
collective response to major oil spills.
(AP Photo/Noah Berger)
Against a backdrop of flying sparks from repairs on the container ship Cosco Busan, a Bay Area delegation of state assemblymembers in San Francisco pledged to introduce legislation aimed at improving a collective response to major oil spills.
SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - Against a backdrop of flying sparks from repairs on the container ship Cosco Busan, a Bay Area delegation of state assemblymembers in San Francisco today pledged to introduce legislation aimed at improving a collective response to major oil spills.

The delegation, led by Assemblywoman Loni Hancock, D-East Bay, also called on Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger to set up an independent commission to review the Nov. 7 San Francisco Bay oil spill response effort and make improvements to the state's oil spill response program.

Hancock, Assembly Speaker Pro Tempore Sally Lieber, D-San Jose, Assemblyman Mark Leno, D-San Francisco, Assemblyman Ira Ruskin, D-Redwood City, and Assemblyman Jared Huffman, D-San Rafael, made the announcement this morning at the Ramp Restaurant, located on San Francisco's bay waterfront.

Across the water rested the docked 900-foot container ship whose hull seeped 58,000 gallons of toxic bunker fuel into the bay after the vessel collided with a Bay Bridge tower on its way from the Port of Oakland.

This story continues below
Advertisement

Less than one-third of the oil was subsequently recovered by cleanup crews, according to U.S. Coast Guard figures.

Oil showed up on beaches from the East Bay to San Francisco, and from Marin County south to San Mateo County. Thousands of birds were killed or injured.

Calling the spill a "bitter wake up call" for the Bay Area, Hancock said the response procedures in place at the time "were not adequate" to protect the bay's fragile ecosystem.

Hancock expressed dismay that local responders were told "they did not have the authority to do what needed to be done," she said.

Hancock said she would author bills to require quick notification of local emergency responders, train local emergency responders and volunteers, increase state funds for oil spill response, and apply stricter standards to large non-tanker vessels, such as the Cosco Busan.

"We're as vulnerable today as we were a month ago," Leno declared.

"There's no time to waste," he added, and addressed the need for an independent review.

"We can't have our own agencies self-assessing what went wrong," Leno said.

Leno will propose legislation to provide grants for oil spill containment and cleanup technology to replace current technologies that he said are decades old.

Leno said he would push for increases in minimum response standards the first hours after a spill and for mutual-aid agreements between agencies in the same region for "the quickest possible response."

"I would encourage the shipping industry to work with us," said Leno. Better preparedness would decrease liability for companies responsible for spills, he said.

Other bills would seek to require tugboat escorts for vessels carrying hazardous materials; designate ecologically sensitive areas for additional response planning and protection; and improve preparedness and response for inland oil spills.

The proposed legislation will be submitted in January, according to a spokesman for Hancock.

State Sen. Carole Migden, D-San Francisco/North Bay, and other state senators today also announced the introduction of similar legislation addressing oil spill response and called on the governor to support an independent investigation of the Cosco Busan response by the state auditor.

— Bay City News

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

6:17 AM MST on Sat., Dec. 29, 2007 re: "Cosco Busan owners pay $80M to leave"

Examiner Reader said:
Examiner Reader said: The ship's destination was QINQDAO (Tsingtao), China, not Korea as reported above. 7 agree | 6 disagree Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree How does one disagree with a statement of provable fact?

151 agree | 141 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

6:12 AM MST on Sat., Dec. 29, 2007 re: "Tests show Bay water is clean"

Examiner Reader said:
"Additionally, state officials said that tests conducted by a California Department of Fish and Game biologist last week that found what seemed to be oil found in local herring fisheries were “inclusive,” according to Lt. Rob Roberts of the Department of Fish and Game’s Office of Spill Prevention and Response." Perhaps "inconclusive" was intended

125 agree | 102 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:56 PM MST on Thu., Dec. 20, 2007 re: "Cosco Busan owners pay $80M to leave"

Examiner Reader said:
The ship's destination was QINQDAO (Tsingtao), China, not Korea as reported above.

160 agree | 164 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:23 PM MST on Thu., Dec. 20, 2007 re: "Group turns oil into food for ’shrooms"

Examiner Reader said:
The Coast Guard did not turn away the Fire Department boat that came to investigate. That is false. The Coast Guard did, inform them of the 100 yard safey zoen around the Cosco Busan after the incident occurred. The statement implies that the Coast Guard is covering up this incident, which is ridiculous.

194 agree | 148 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:30 AM MST on Tue., Dec. 11, 2007 re: "Bay spill lawsuits pour in"

Examiner Reader said:
Hey, SFoff, I live in SF and yes my county did fail miserably in their response. I just wonder if Dennis Herrera is really going to believe that he will get 25K for each day of the spill from Captain Cota.

138 agree | 142 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:50 PM MST on Tue., Dec. 4, 2007 re: "Supervisor slams response to oil spill"

SFoff said:
Dear Examiner reader (first grade level, apparently)12:40pm. There was no mention of S.F. being the only county affected by the spill. The article was from a San Francisco Newspaper, regarding San Francisco's response to the oil spill. Not very obscure. It's all clear in context. Nobody was wondering why SF. "was not kept in the loop". He is questioning why S.F. did not enter the loop of it's own accord, considering how much "training and partnership" had been established. Are we supposed to be happy with our particular cities response because your county also failed miserably to do anything in time to prevent this problem? And BTW, S.F. is not the center of the Universe, just the Solar System, but thanks for the exaggeration!

158 agree | 169 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:40 PM MST on Tue., Dec. 4, 2007 re: "Supervisor slams response to oil spill"

Examiner Reader said:
... and San Francisco was the only city, the only county affected by this spill. It seems that SF is to self-centered in this incident, wondering why it was not kept in teh loop. It seems that many other cities and counties were affected by this incident. way to go SF. Show you true colors. If ross Mirkirami wants to be mayor in 2012 then he should just come out and proclaim that San Francisco is in fact, the center of the universe. Then he will get my vote

161 agree | 148 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:00 PM MST on Tue., Dec. 4, 2007 re: "Supervisor slams response to oil spill"

Examiner Reader said:
Seems strange that we would be knocking ourselves up for something we had little control over and had misleading info about. One would think you can rely on the Coast Guard to provide accurate info, since this IS their jurisdiction, but to get the info wrong hours later and even when others are pointing out that it's a LARGE spill (and to ignore this emergency) seems unconscionable. This, to me, should be about the ship crashing into the bridge tower and the bungled response of the Coast Guard, their effect on the greater Bay Area and effective preventive measures.

160 agree | 144 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:34 PM MST on Thu., Nov. 29, 2007 re: "Waters now safe, fishing to resume"

Examiner Reader said:
Its my understanding two-thirds of the 58,000 gallons of oil is unaccounted for and will remain so. The water quality of San Francisco Bay was questionable before this event. Some sort of blanket statement regarding the "safeness" of the bay water seems a bit dubious to me.

319 agree | 169 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:32 AM MST on Thu., Nov. 29, 2007 re: "Bay Bridge bumper bits lost"

Examiner Reader said:
Having said that black made it harder to find the missing pieces of plastic lumber, they're going to use black again for the replacement?!! Foolish.

392 agree | 138 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:34 AM MST on Mon., Nov. 26, 2007 re: "Birds death toll continues climb following oil spill"

Examiner Reader said:
Very self indulgent of you to equate an oil spill dead birds and your situation. Get over it already.

246 agree | 186 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement