Change my location 
|
|
Article History There are updates to this article.
SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - Nearly 1,500 drivers statewide were arrested on suspicion of driving under the influence of alcohol Thanksgiving weekend, 207 of which were in the Bay Area, California Highway Patrol Sgt. Les Bishop said Sunday.
The preliminary numbers from the CHP Maximum Enforcement Period from 6 p.m. Wednesday through 6 a.m. Sunday revealed fewer people were arrested in 2007 than in 2006 on suspicion of drunken driving, according to Bishop.
During the holiday weekend in 2006, 217 people in the Bay Area and 1,542 statewide were arrested on suspicion of driving under the influence.
However, the number of fatal car accidents in the Bay Area over Thanksgiving weekend increased compared with the same period in 2006. Two fatal collisions occurred in the Bay Area in the enforcement period, compared with none in the same period in 2006, Bishop said.
The number of statewide traffic fatalities was down according to preliminary totals, he said.
This year, 34 people were killed in traffic-related deaths on CHP patrolled highways and city patrolled roadways, according to Bishop. The number is down from the 37 traffic deaths reported in the same period in 2006.
Statistics from the weekend are preliminary and will be updated again with more accurate numbers, according to Bishop.
— Bay City News
 Not ranked |
 EMAIL ME THIS STORY |
ARTICLE HISTORY 
Comments from Examiner Readers
1:16 PM MST on Wed., Jul. 23, 2008 re: "City ‘gateway toll’ considered"
Report as inappropriate
10:59 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 23, 2008
re: "City ‘gateway toll’ considered"
Report as inappropriate
10:41 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 23, 2008
re: "City ‘gateway toll’ considered"
Report as inappropriate
2:43 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 1, 2008
re: "A way around crash sites"
Report as inappropriate
1:21 AM MST on Mon., Jun. 30, 2008
re: "Three die in crash-filled weekend"
Report as inappropriate
8:00 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 18, 2008
re: "I-95 north of Baltimore home to region’s worst bottlenecks"
Report as inappropriate
7:31 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 18, 2008
re: "I-95 north of Baltimore home to region’s worst bottlenecks"
Report as inappropriate
3:49 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 2, 2008
re: "Crash won't accelerate bridge-median plan"
Report as inappropriate
1:03 PM MST on Thu., Jan. 17, 2008
re: "Bad weather causes traffic delays around District"
Report as inappropriate
8:16 PM MST on Wed., Nov. 28, 2007
re: "Golden Gate Bridge tragedy could have been worse"
Report as inappropriate
4:44 PM MST on Wed., Nov. 28, 2007
re: "Golden Gate Bridge tragedy could have been worse"
Report as inappropriate
9:16 AM MST on Wed., Oct. 17, 2007
re: "Study: Traffic costs D.C. $2B, Baltimore $1 billion annually"
Report as inappropriate
6:09 PM MST on Sun., Sep. 9, 2007
re: "Triathlon will snarl Sunday traffic"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
I guess SF really doesn't want people to come to the City! What a load of crock. Nobody in the SF govt has any business sense. Great, kill the goose that lays the golden eggs (businesses and sales taxes).
1 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
just shoot me said:
sweet - another friggin toll. I already pay $1000/month in commute costs.
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
If there were a viable, reliable CLEAN option then people would be able to not drive. Without that option people must drive. Clean up MUNI, make it dependable and regular and co- ordinate with other transit agencies and people will want to get out of their cars. As it is if you are in a hurry or out of communte hours MUNI is not an option. Also, I am unclear why people love BART!. Signage is pathetic and it is NOT co-ordinated with MUNI or Golden Gate transit, what's the point? Take a look at NYC, London or Paris to get a look at what good transit systems are. Funny, their workers show up and they keep to a timetable. Maybe we could try doing that?
1 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Bruce Simmons said:
for one, I don't understand how it cost $30 million to instigate the deployment of traffic control officers and traffic cones. Second, how would diverting a traffic jam to El Camino Real alleviate anything. El Camino Real is already questionably jammed up at traffic time and the ensuing flood of motor vehicles would only spill the excess onto the various side streets around that road. Spend the $30 million where it's needed, on the school systems or homeless shelters.
2 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
R.I.P. DeKeisha Skaggs! We will all miss you! -Jessica G. P.
4 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
600 Million dollars? Much too expensive and way too late to fix the problem. By the time the road is built, no one will care because the people will be gone.
2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
These choke points have been around for over 30 years - and the drivers that dart into the lane and slam on their brakes that have not killed themselves are still endangering the rest of us! Leave the Baltimore area for good - I did 12 years ago and life is so much better since I don't have to deal with the crime or the local corporate societal ladder. I love to hear the companies complain about the lack of talent in the region. The problem is everybody in the Baltimore business district is trying to rape each other so what is left is table scraps for the locals - they don't have a problem hiring out of staters and paying them big bucks but if you are a local they hate the fact that they are reliant on you - especially if you are white and have a moral value system.
2 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
ms jackson said:
All this money spent on highway dividers, anti smoking campaigns, youth violence intiatives, dietary labeling, unwanted pregnancies, anti suicide barriers, etc. could be saved by introducing a microscopic brain implant that would cause extreme pain and forced change of action any time somebody begins to behave in a way that creates any sort of societal problems. Of course, this would mean about 95 percent of huimanity would be constantly groaning in pain and apparently changing their minds!
6 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
oh my gosh that is bad people need to start being more careful
148 agree | 121 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
When someone does something like this, it not only saves lives, it leaves the rest of us with the knowledge that one of us did a great good thing. I'm so grateful for that knowledge. John Beatty is a really good man.
198 agree | 204 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
San Francisco Voter said:
Wow. I knew there were at least a few good people around here.
208 agree | 198 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Mike Licht said:
>>Re: Study: Traffic costs D.C. $2B, Baltimore $1 billion annually<< Editorial decision to omit hyperlink to the actual study is a gross disservice to readers.
231 agree | 223 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
William Cooke said:
Great race. Thanks Annapolis, Annapolis Police, and AA County Police.
291 agree | 239 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree