Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
By a 10-1 vote, San Francisco supervisors this afternoon approved an ordinance granting municipal ID cards to all city residents who request them.
The ordinance also received support from local immigrant rights and labor groups, homeless shelters and transgender communities.
According to Ammiano, many residents, including documented and undocumented immigrants, seniors, children, students, homeless persons and transgender individuals, lack government-issued identification, limiting their ability to open a bank account, get a library card, access parks and other public facilities, receive homeless aid, or obtain discounts at city museums, golf courses and the zoo.
Ammiano also cited public safety concerns, contending that residents without bank accounts are more prone to robbery because they may have a large amount of cash on them or in their home. In addition, Ammiano said, residents who can't provide proof of identity are less likely to report crimes.
The ordinance goes into effect in August 2008, after which residents will be able to receive cards through the county clerk's office at City Hall, according to Ammiano's office.
The cards will have a $15 application fee for adults and $5 for seniors and minors, and will require another form of photo identification and proof of residency, such as foreign, business or school ID, utility bills or homeless shelter verification.
— Bay City News



Comments from Examiner Readers
2:55 PM MST on Thu., Nov. 22, 2007 re: "Supes approve city ID cards"
Report as inappropriate
6:36 PM MST on Wed., Nov. 21, 2007
re: "Supes approve city ID cards"
Report as inappropriate
4:23 PM MST on Wed., Nov. 21, 2007
re: "Supes approve city ID cards"
Report as inappropriate
3:21 PM MST on Wed., Nov. 21, 2007
re: "Supes approve city ID cards"
Report as inappropriate
3:20 PM MST on Wed., Nov. 21, 2007
re: "Supes approve city ID cards"
Report as inappropriate
12:43 PM MST on Wed., Nov. 21, 2007
re: "Supes approve city ID cards"
Report as inappropriate
12:41 PM MST on Wed., Nov. 21, 2007
re: "Supes approve city ID cards"
Report as inappropriate
7:13 AM MST on Wed., Nov. 21, 2007
re: "Supes approve city ID cards"
Report as inappropriate
7:11 AM MST on Wed., Nov. 21, 2007
re: "Supes approve city ID cards"
Report as inappropriate
5:22 AM MST on Wed., Nov. 21, 2007
re: "Supes approve city ID cards"
Report as inappropriate
4:06 AM MST on Wed., Nov. 21, 2007
re: "Supes approve city ID cards"
Report as inappropriate
10:27 PM MST on Tue., Nov. 20, 2007
re: "Supes approve city ID cards"
Report as inappropriate
10:03 PM MST on Tue., Nov. 20, 2007
re: "Supes approve city ID cards"
Report as inappropriate
9:29 PM MST on Tue., Nov. 20, 2007
re: "Supes approve city ID cards"
Report as inappropriate
8:26 PM MST on Tue., Nov. 20, 2007
re: "Supes approve city ID cards"
Report as inappropriate
8:20 PM MST on Tue., Nov. 20, 2007
re: "Supes approve city ID cards"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
The San Francisco Supervisors and Mayor are helping to quicken the pace of the RECONQIUSTA OF CALIFORNIA AND THE SOUTHWEST. I realize liberal/progressives consider that statement idiotic. I just wonder what their reasons would be for considering it idiotic. Are they thinking to themselves, "of course were doing it to further Mexicos influence in the United States", or are they simply thinking" wow this is another weird statement by some wacked out conservative,"hater". You mean like the ones Nancy Pelosi ("we are going to clean up the corruption")loves. We can see how honest she was about that. The truth is she is perfectly aligned with the policies of the Bush Administration and their sycophantic followers on every issue. Including eliminating the U.S. in favor of a North American Union with Canada and the Narco State, south of us. Good luck to you, your friends and your families you foolish people who allow this stuff.
105 agree | 84 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
You voted for it with Newsom. This is nothing, this guy has a mandate from the voters to pretty much do anything he wants.
123 agree | 111 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Seven said:
Ed Jew would have been against this. Carmen Chu, of course, asks the mayor before voting.
111 agree | 116 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
"Thank you SF....Baghdad by the Bay..." Hey, that's offensive to the people of Baghdad!
108 agree | 101 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
reader said: If there are 100,000 illegals getting cards, that will generate $1.5M in revenue to the city. That's Ammiano's plan - he is going to balance the city's budget on the back of illegal immigrants. All he needs is another $6.5Billion! Hey, no problem. They can make it up in volume. How many illegals will it take to get that 6.5 bil? About 400 million I guess. We can send all 30 million illegals in the US to San Fran, and then recruit 1000% more from other countries. Now let's see, how many cubic feet do 400 million people occupy and how many cubic feet of useable space does San Fran have? We may have to house some of the people in the bay.
96 agree | 95 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The mayor was on KGO this am explaining how this ID program is going to work and what the benefit would be to those getting one. I've never heard so much double talk in awhile. Nothing he said made sense, for example you need to show and ID of some type to received one of these new cards. Homeless have to show proof of city residence to get one. I guess you can rip off someones PG & E bill and use that. Once again any program offered up by this board of supes will not work and cost more than is estimated.
117 agree | 111 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
June said:
I think the patriots of the greatest generation are thoroughly sick of what today's politicans (dirty word), big business and anti-american groups have done to the country they fought and gave their lives for. What a sad ending.
107 agree | 105 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
If there are 100,000 illegals getting cards, that will generate $1.5M in revenue to the city. That's Ammiano's plan - he is going to balance the city's budget on the back of illegal immigrants. All he needs is another $6.5Billion!
113 agree | 119 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Illegals will work harder than City Workers - Let's fire everyone who works for the city and hire $8 buck an hour illegals on Army Street. We can't do worse.
109 agree | 101 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
HA HA HA said:
I live in San Jose. When the cards become available, I'll get one!!!
100 agree | 76 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
IF these 10 supervisors are voted back into office, then the eligible voters of San Francisco will get to watch their great city deterioriate right before their eyes. I agree with the Malibu resident, starting with next August, what's left of the State of California will have a repository for all illegal immigrants. Plato once said, "The punishment of wise men who refuse to take part in the government is to live under the government of worse men". Your choice San Francisco...the wolves have spoken. Now are you all sheep...or sheepdogs?
99 agree | 89 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I think we should replace all the Supes with illegal aliens and pay the illegals a quarter of what the Supes are getting paid now. The Supes have no idea who they represent or why the are in office.
128 agree | 104 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Why doesn't San Francisco just declare its independance from both California and the United States? Both the state and the country would be better off without this city. It's a shame we can't just pick it up and move it south of the border... because that's where it belongs.
109 agree | 88 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
examiner critic said:
After everyone currently living in SF has an opportunity to get an ID, thus declaring themselves residents, we need to issue visitor permits to anyone wishing to be here for more than one month. Then set requirements to extend permits or to become SF residents as they do in the Netherlands. This will stop the influx of vagrants and limit use of our homeless resources to our own residents.
102 agree | 101 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader...Mr tim said:
Thank you SF....Baghdad by the Bay...Down here in Malibu we thank you...now we know where to send our illegal aliens...wooopps...illegal immigrant(s)...We're cash broke down here so, if you don't mind picking up the fee , what's another $5 or $15...spot..we'll 'LOVE YOU' for it.....say hello to all the voters who made it possible.....
129 agree | 89 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Seven said:
So, which supervisor voted against it? I might want to move to their district.
109 agree | 98 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree