Threat sends Pr. George’s kids for shots
Article History
There are updates to this article.

WASHINGTON (Map, News) - Robert Goenaga didn’t tell his aunt he lacked all the vaccinations he needed to continue his education at Flowers High School in Prince George’s County.

State’s Attorney Glenn Ivey did.

In a letter Robert’s aunt and legal guardian, Maria, received earlier this week, Ivey told her she could face legal action if she wasn’t able to prove that 16-year-old Robert was up to date on his immunizations.

Even if she had known that Robert, who came to live with her from the Bronx, needed another in the series of hepatitis B shots required by the state, Maria, who asked that her last name not be used because she works in a government office, said it would have been difficult to get it taken care of.

“I can’t get off work,” she said. “It’s hard. I don’t have no medical assistance for him. That’s what’s really hard.”

Ivey announced earlier this week that parents of up to as many as 2,300 children could face fines of up to $50 per day or 10 days in jail for failing to fully immunize their children. Starting Saturday, parents of some of those unvaccinated children are expected to appear before a Prince George’s Circuit Court judge for a hearing over why those children haven’t been properly vaccinated and to offer the shots that they need.

It is the first time that Ivey remembers having to resort to the courts in the county’s recent history to get children immunized. He said it is possible for parents who have religious, health or other objections to immunization.

The threats seemed to have worked for some people. Only 1,111 students remained without proper vaccinations as of late Thursday, public schools spokesman John White said.

Robert, who has been allowed to attend school because he has had some of the shots required by the schools, was not one of those.

Five minutes after walking into a Cheverly clinic, Robert and Maria, who was able to take a few hours off from her job Thursday, returned to their car. They were turned away because they didn’t have an appointment.

“Now I can’t do nothing,” Maria said.

cmabeus@dcexaminer.com


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

9:22 AM MST on Mon., Dec. 3, 2007 re: "State attorney gets names of vaccine-dodging parents"

Mike Licht said:
>>Re: State attorney gets names of vaccine-dodging parents<< PG has a medical records problem, not an immunization problem. Is there not a childhood immunization registry? The federal government has grants for these and the software is free.

53 agree | 54 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

11:11 AM MST on Tue., Nov. 20, 2007 re: "Parents of unvaccinated kids face fines"

BostonRay said:
When I was a child and came down with the measles/mumps/chickenpox it was nothing to run scared about. In fact, the other mothers in the neighborhood used to send in their kids to play with me so everyone would come down with the same thing and everyone would get over it at once. It was, and is, a normal rite of growing up and it was how you built immunity to many diseases. It was common sense. No one cried EPIDEMIC because there was no epidemic. Public health, in order to advance their power, now cries epidemic over everything. Isolated local episodes are now claimed as epidemics and you need public health to save you - it's a croc and a lie.

81 agree | 66 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:06 AM MST on Tue., Nov. 20, 2007 re: "Parents of unvaccinated kids face fines"

Provocatuer said:
May an epidemic of measles, mumps or something worse would arouse us from our smug attitudes. It's not impossible with all these undocumented (read not medically cleared) in the country. Go ahead, talk trash. You tune may be different if one of yours gets sick.

69 agree | 81 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:56 AM MST on Tue., Nov. 20, 2007 re: "Parents of unvaccinated kids face fines"

BostonRay said:
This is the pharmaceutical industry utilizing the legal system to force their product on the public for monetary gain. They have perfected this ruse of using the false claim of 'public health' initially through smoking bans in order to reap huge profits from smoking cessation products. Having been so successful at using government and it's easily manipulated educational system to advance their mercantile profit agenda, they are now getting courts to force parents out of the control of their own children. This is what happens when they use the phrase "it's for the children".

68 agree | 78 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:33 AM MST on Tue., Nov. 20, 2007 re: "Parents of unvaccinated kids face fines"

Examiner Reader said:
So the "Government" says "you HAVE to let us inject your child with whatever we may put in that vile or go to jail". Now, just what all could the "Government" put in that vile? Just how do you know what your child is really getting?

81 agree | 81 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:49 AM MST on Tue., Nov. 20, 2007 re: "Parents of unvaccinated kids face fines"

G said:
Give them a break, they probably don't remember what kids are theirs.

71 agree | 77 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.17 seconds)