Ocean Beach closed entirely
Article History
There are updates to this article.

SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - The National Park Service closed all of San Francisco’s Ocean Beach on Wednesday because of the oil spill Nov. 7 in the San Francisco Bay.

The southern portion of the beach was closed Tuesday at 7 p.m. from the Cliffhouse to Lincoln Avenue, Shirwin Smith of the National Park Service said. The northern portion was temporarily reopened Tuesday when it appeared to be clear of oil. It was shut again because oil appears to have returned to the area.

“We thought they’d come out OK, but it was looking like the oil was coming back,” Smith said.

The beach is closed “until further notice, like all the beaches, until we can get a grip on their status,” Smith said.

Nearly 30 beaches around the Bay Area remain closed while 1,517 people participate in a vast cleanup efforts, said the U.S. Coast Guard.

— Bay City News


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

2:11 PM MST on Wed., Mar. 12, 2008 re: "Mayor’s messaging after oil spill ‘private’"

Examiner Reader said:
If its the public's business coming through a private device, why is it any less the public's business? The mayor is saving our tax dollars by not billing us for his cell phone and service? Right.

7 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

12:44 PM MST on Wed., Nov. 14, 2007 re: "Cosco Busan may be moved soon"

Examiner Reader said:
It's a container vessel not a tanker. You wrote in the same article, "... allowing the tanker ship to relocate from the middle of the San Francisco Bay to a local shipyard ..." "The 900-foot container vessel has been anchored in the greasy waters of the San Francisco Bay since Wednesday,..."

144 agree | 117 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:42 PM MST on Tue., Nov. 13, 2007 re: "Cosco Busan may be moved soon"

Examiner Reader said:
What use was pilot John Cota? Wasn't it his job to prevent such mishaps? I would hope he has been suspended until further investigations conclude.

122 agree | 137 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.14 seconds)