CHANGE MY LOCATION
Local
California News
Multimedia News
County rules trees can’t be cut to make way for airport work
SEE THE LATEST ON THIS STORY
Related Topics: BALTIMORE
BALTIMORE (Map, News) - Residents fighting a runway expansion appear to have won their battle to preserve trees near the Carroll County Regional Airport — for now.
About 330 trees will not be razed near the airport north of Westminster unless the forest is removed from a conservation zone, Steven Powell, Carroll’s chief of staff, ruled Tuesday.
But variances to county, state or federal law are granted only in the “most extraordinary of situations,” he wrote in his decision denying a county request to clear more trees than allowed under county code.
The local branch of the state forestry board rejected the plan to cut down the trees in August, saying it would leave the forest too bare.
Cindy Parr, chief of administrative services, sought a variance in September. She cited a 2002 study saying the trees need to be cleared to create room for a lighting system to improve safety for landing aircraft.
Powell’s decision shows that of the six acres where trees would be cut, 3.75 acres are protected under the county’s Forest Conservation Plan, and if that designation were changed to a different section of the forest, the trees marked for clearing could be taken down.
Residents have railed against the tree-razing since they heard of the county’s planned runway expansion at the airport, from 5,100 feet to 6,400.
Ron Buczkowski, a resident opposed to the airport expansion and tree removal, said Powell’s decision is a public relations move, and by leaving room to change where the conservation plan is applied, the county will still raze the trees.
“It’s just another way to go through with it,” he said. “There’s no question it has to do with the airport expansion.”
Residents also decried the county’s decision to allow Powell to oversee tree clearing, because he works closely with the county commissioners, who approved the airport expansion, and Parr, who applied for the variance.
Parr said she will not appeal Powell’s decision to the county commissioners.
msilvestri@baltimoreexaminer.com
Comments from Examiner Readers
11:08 AM MST on Fri., May. 9, 2008 re: "Residents hope bog turtles block expansion at airport"
Report as inappropriate
2:20 PM MST on Sun., Mar. 9, 2008
re: "Residents hire lawyers to save trees"
Report as inappropriate
7:45 AM MST on Fri., Nov. 9, 2007
re: "Airport manager removed amid expansion controversy"
Report as inappropriate
12:01 PM MST on Fri., Aug. 31, 2007
re: "Carroll looks to feds to ease airport woes"
Report as inappropriate
8:45 PM MST on Fri., Aug. 24, 2007
re: "State says black splotches on roofs are not jet fuel"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
The State of Maryland Heritage Group will do a Bog Turtle study as well. That group found the turtle in a wet land near the bi-pass. FEAR the TURTLE
6 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Barney said:
Hug a tree now, plant one later.
6 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Linda said:
This is a no brainer, of course the county would hire Delta, the same people that recommended the expansion, no objective decisions will be made there.
121 agree | 112 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Or... said:
Or maybe Tregoning can send his deputies out door-to-door to explain it all.
149 agree | 151 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Maybe the State Police can spend some of their extra $500,000 dollars to help solve this..
152 agree | 157 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree