Multimedia News

Notables who have lost children
6 photos
John Travolta's 16-year-old son Jett died Jan...
New Year, New You
6 photos
Oprah regrets her weight gain over the past y...
Hopman Cup highlights
6 photos
Russia's Dinara Safina returns a shot against...
Ski jumping at its finest
6 photos
Ski jumper Nicolas Mayer from France flies du...
Virginia Tech beats Cincinnati in Orange Bowl
6 photos
Virginia Tech's Darren Evans (32) celebrates ...

Alms for the environment?

Nov 5, 2007 10:22 PM (429 days ago) by David Smith, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: SAN FRANCISCO
A poll found that Bay Area residents are willing to pay a 25-cent gas tax.
(Mike Koozmin/Special to The Examiner)
A poll found that Bay Area residents are willing to pay a 25-cent gas tax.
SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - Would Bay Area residents, already saddled with the highest gas prices in the country, be willing to pay a 25-cent fee on a gallon of gas if the money were spent to reduce the effects of global warming? According to a new poll, the answer is an unresounding “yes.”

Preliminary findings indicate that Bay Area residents were “mostly willing to pay 25 cents more” for a gallon of gas “if it would be used to limit or reduce global warming,” according to a recent telephone poll commissioned by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission.

The same residents opposed a fee of 50 cents or one dollar for the same cause, according to the poll.

MTC spokesman John Goodwin said the poll’s purpose was to “gauge public attitudes” as the agency moves forward with its next 25-year regional transportation plan. The plan would detail future strategies throughout the nine-county Bay Area region for maintaining and improving transportation in the region.

This story continues below
Advertisement

BW Research Partnership Inc. conducted the poll over three weeks beginning in mid-September, and interviewed 1,800 residents in the Bay Area.

The residents also indicated they would want the additional revenue from such an increase to go toward providing more transit services and research into alternative fuels and cleaner engines, according to the memo. The final results of the poll will be released at the Thursday meeting of MTC’s planning committee.

Since the late 1990s, the MTC has been authorized to place up to a 10-cent regional gas tax on the ballot for voters, which would require a two-thirds majority vote for passage, Goodwin said.

There is “no specific proposal” for such a tax currently, said Goodwin, adding that the poll was more about “exploring attitudes rather than probing a potential ballot measure.”

“This poll question goes into a whole new territory in asking about climate change,” Goodwin said.

According to reports, the most recent survey of gas prices across the country — released Nov. 4 — indicated San Francisco had the most expensive gas in the U.S. at $3.28 per gallon.

Sean Comey, a spokesman for AAA, said gas prices have been going steadily up since the beginning of September, when gas in The City cost on average $2.98. Currently the average cost of a gallon of gas in The City is $3.39, according to AAA data.

dsmith@examiner.com

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

4:15 PM MST on Tue., Nov. 6, 2007 re: "Alms for the environment?"

Examiner Reader said:
Right! Pay an extra 25 cents per gallon for a government program guaranteed to spend 100% of it on administrative costs and ineffectual, but wonderful sounding, projects. Do you really trust the government to spend your money more wisely than you can?

116 agree | 111 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

2:11 PM MST on Tue., Nov. 6, 2007 re: "Alms for the environment?"

Examiner Reader said:
Super! I propose that gas stations be equipped to allow individuals to choose to pay this extra tax. If you think your taxes are too low, they pay up! Meanwhile, the rest of us will vote Republican. Somebody stop the Gorebal warming scam now.

123 agree | 115 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement