Los Angeles Examiners

Walid Nasserdeen
LA Finance Examiner
Most Recent Article
Yahoo! CEO? Yang's memo to employees
R.E. Xavier
LA Small Business Examiner
Most Recent Article
Small business resolutions for the New Year
 
 

Multimedia News

Notables who have lost children
6 photos
John Travolta's 16-year-old son Jett died Jan...
New Year, New You
6 photos
Oprah regrets her weight gain over the past y...
Hopman Cup highlights
6 photos
Russia's Dinara Safina returns a shot against...
Ski jumping at its finest
6 photos
Ski jumper Nicolas Mayer from France flies du...
Virginia Tech beats Cincinnati in Orange Bowl
6 photos
Virginia Tech's Darren Evans (32) celebrates ...

Maryland’s horse racing industry losing ground, facing big challenges

Nov 5, 2007 12:00 AM (429 days ago) by Aaron Cahall, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: BALTIMORE
The racing industry in Maryland generates about $800 million annually, including $72 million in taxes. Jockey Robby Albarado riding Curlin, left, edges out Calvin Borel and Kentucky Derby winner Street Sense at the finish line during the Preakness Stakes at Pimlico on May 19.
(Chris Ammann/Examiner)
The racing industry in Maryland generates about $800 million annually, including $72 million in taxes. Jockey Robby Albarado riding Curlin, left, edges out Calvin Borel and Kentucky Derby winner Street Sense at the finish line during the Preakness Stakes at Pimlico on May 19.
BALTIMORE (Map, News) - Maryland’s horse breeders are once again looking to slots to reverse years of decline, driven by the same kind of operations in other states, that have eroded the once-mighty racing industry.

“I’d say it’s pretty sick,” said Mike Hopkins, chairman of the Maryland Racing Commission. “I don’t think it’s beyond coming back, but it’s going to take a lot of time.”

The racing industry in Maryland generates about $800 million annually, including $72 million in taxes, said Rob Burk, executive director of the Maryland Horse Industry Board, a division of the state Department of Agriculture.

A Maryland Equine Census, conducted in 2002 by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, showed 20,200 horse farms in Maryland — from large stables to small backyard pastures — totaling 87,000 horses. About 40 percent of those horses are used for racing.

This story continues below
Advertisement

Maryland also has more horses per square mile, eight, than any other state, including Kentucky, according to the department’s census. Burk hopes to complete an updated study by 2009.

The Maryland Jockey Club has reported at least a 50 percent decline in operating horse farms in the state in the last several years. Most of that business seems to be going to nearby states, Burk said.

“We haven’t done an exact study to find out why they’re leaving,” he said. “But at the same time the numbers in Maryland have declined by half, the numbers in Pennsylvania have doubled.”

A key factor in the shift is incentives attached to purses — the extra money awarded to a breeder if a winning horse was raised in that state. Maryland spends about $3 million on the incentives, but neighboring states offer as much as $50 million total, Burk said.

The actual amount of thoroughbred racing taking place has decreased as well.

A decade ago, Maryland’s tracks operated 306 racing days, Hopkins said. This year, that number is down to 190 — and next year, only 135 to 140 racing days are scheduled, he said.

“You’re basically transforming a business that’s been a year-round employment base to a part-time [job],” Hopkins said. “They’re running four days a week now. Most of those people at the race track are paid per diem, so going to four days from five, you cut their paycheck 20 percent.”

For all the industry’s financial woes, Burk said Maryland’s thoroughbred horse breed is still respectable. If slots do come to the tracks, he added, the state will be back on equal footing with its neighbors, and the playing field will once again be level.

“From a racing perspective and a breeding perspective, Maryland has been king,” Burk said. “If the money is put into the state’s racing industry, hopefully once again our infrastructure ... will win out against our competitors, like it used to.”

acahall@baltimoreexaminer.com

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

8:02 PM MST on Fri., May. 23, 2008 re: "Saddling up for Preakness Celebration"

Examiner Reader said:
What is the Preakness named after??????

7 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

8:45 AM MST on Wed., Nov. 7, 2007 re: "Slots alone won’t save horse racing"

Examiner Reader said:
Slots certainly won't save horse racing in Baltimore since coruppt O'Malley and Dixon are plotting to put them downtown NOT at or NEAR any race track!

117 agree | 125 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:37 AM MST on Wed., Nov. 7, 2007 re: "Slots alone won’t save horse racing"

Examiner Reader said:
Why should slots have to "save" horse racing? If the market does not support an enterprise, that enterprise should be allowed to go away.

139 agree | 145 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:02 AM MST on Wed., Nov. 7, 2007 re: "Slots alone won’t save horse racing"

Examiner Reader said:
Horse racing has set it's path in Maryland many years before the issue of slots came up. The blame goes straight to the Maryland Jockey club. They have been penny wise and pound foolist for many years and time waits for no one. Horse racing is dying evey were, No on wants to watch horse run when they can grab a rub off or just push a switch. Wake up Maryland, Slot/ Horse racing means welfare for the rich!

152 agree | 116 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:21 PM MST on Tue., Nov. 6, 2007 re: "Slots alone won’t save horse racing"

Kingie Ala Mode said:
too much racing, tracks will increase ourses on big stake races but do nothing for the fans. Who cares if the Travers is a 1 million dollar purse. Make it half and don't sell bottled water for $5 and charge 3 times as much to get in to the tracks.

115 agree | 135 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:00 PM MST on Tue., Nov. 6, 2007 re: "Slots alone won’t save horse racing"

Examiner Reader said:
She also won't rush to deal with homicide rate" That is because she is too busy banging Ed Norris, haven't you heard. Being around certain people allows for privy of certain info, and yes MOM has had more then a few affairs. Did you really think that I would waste my years of good principle on that?? Oh ye of little faith, and yea I am the sucker! But I know where my future is headed do you??? Obviously not, when you take evil over good, blinded faith is what you have and serve!!! At least I can say I did what I truly believed to be the right thing to do in God's eyes, how about you with your white trailer trash!!!!

138 agree | 118 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:53 PM MST on Tue., Nov. 6, 2007 re: "Slots alone won’t save horse racing"

Examiner Reader said:
you are too serious, no harm meant. Now, how about this, "They should know the sincere gift to help keep things calm." I must have blinders on because I am in the dark on this one.

166 agree | 134 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:37 AM MST on Tue., Nov. 6, 2007 re: "Slots alone won’t save horse racing"

Too serous said:
If I had the strength and stamina of a horse I would say ........get er done! Viagra helps i hear. Most phillies say.

164 agree | 123 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:37 AM MST on Tue., Nov. 6, 2007 re: "Slots alone won’t save horse racing"

Examiner Reader said:
I am a Marylander and Horseman, We need slots to compete with the other state's around us! Pimlico is a disgrace and not worthy of the Preakness in it's current condition. To attract a new fan base the tracks have to be rebuilt, which will be if slots are appoved. I've seen the blue prints! Maryland will be on top again. The great jockeys like Prado and Desermeaux would return, they love Maryland and want to end the careers were they started. After all, We did build Stadiums for our Football and Baseball Teams. Together they don't even employ close to what the Horse Racing Industry does. Remember we lost the Colts and are on the brink of losing our Fillies also, along with the Preakness.

169 agree | 140 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:33 AM MST on Tue., Nov. 6, 2007 re: "Slots alone won’t save horse racing"

RN said:
If it were not for some of our heritage, the corperations would not be in MD. or tracks. They should know the sincere gift to help keep things calm.

123 agree | 143 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:30 AM MST on Tue., Nov. 6, 2007 re: "Slots alone won’t save horse racing"

tax free marylander said:
horse racing belongs in Md? But at what price? Should we have to dump money into a dying sport so a small percentage of our population can gamble? this can be said of our horrible school system nation wide! lets keep throwing money into a broken vaccume that does not do what it promises! DeFrances and Mega Entertainment should leave Maryland and take their horses w/ them! And dont forget to take MOM too!

145 agree | 131 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:41 AM MST on Tue., Nov. 6, 2007 re: "Slots alone won’t save horse racing"

Examiner Reader said:
I had 2 Tennessee Walkers, didn't race them but nice for riding and pets. Max was my favorite of all, he was my cat, how do you know about max? Horse racing belongs in Maryland it is part of our heritage.

113 agree | 142 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:01 AM MST on Tue., Nov. 6, 2007 re: "Slots alone won’t save horse racing"

RN said:
I will make a call, just need to make sure it is the right thing to do to be efficient.

175 agree | 131 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:44 AM MST on Tue., Nov. 6, 2007 re: "Slots alone won’t save horse racing"

examiner reader said:
"Well lets saddle you up, put 150 pounds on your back, and whip you to make you move faster untill your heart almost expoldes.....than you can tell me its not abuse. Boy are you sick" If I had the strength and stamina of a horse I would say ........get er done! The only one sick is "the living in a shell type of personality." I guess all of us at the race track are sick.....guess you have to live with it.

189 agree | 119 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:41 AM MST on Tue., Nov. 6, 2007 re: "Slots alone won’t save horse racing"

examiner reader said:
A call to the gov is needed. Can help out when i can but the call to the gov is needed for sincerity purposes.

188 agree | 125 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:28 AM MST on Tue., Nov. 6, 2007 re: "Slots alone won’t save horse racing"

examiner reader said:
"Horse racing is animal abuse" There are some instances of animal abuse in Horse racing, but horse racing in itself is not animal abuse. Horses are competitors by nature and will compete to outrun another horse.

135 agree | 125 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:25 AM MST on Tue., Nov. 6, 2007 re: "Pimlico losing lead in horse racing"

Examiner Reader said:
The horse racing industry has failed dismally to develop a fan base, and slots aren't going to be the magic bullet. Preakness Day is the economic engine that keeps the industry afloat, but how many of the folks who go to Pimlico to party in the infield ever go back for an afternoon of racing, or even pay attention to the races while they're there. Right now the Pimlico complex is seriously underutilized. The number of racing days keeps shrinking. The Maryland Jockey Club bought up dozens of decent single family homes and demolished them to make room for whatever is/was expected to develop from the slots venture. These weren't falling down rowhouses, but decent middle-class housing. Now that empty (except for one lone house) strip serves as parking for the Preakness and the occasional big event at Pimlico, but is otherwise vacant. I'd love to see more racing dates at Pimlico, with evening races so that people can go to the track without playing hookey from work.

139 agree | 138 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:23 AM MST on Tue., Nov. 6, 2007 re: "Slots alone won’t save horse racing"

examiner reader said:
Someone should notify the Governor, but how would one do that?

131 agree | 120 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:19 AM MST on Tue., Nov. 6, 2007 re: "Slots alone won’t save horse racing"

RN said:
7:18, Are you correct, has someone notified their Gov

117 agree | 147 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:13 AM MST on Tue., Nov. 6, 2007 re: "Slots alone won’t save horse racing"

examiner reader said:
"There are several Democratic Candidates that can get the job done. More where he came from. MO do not forget this." Yes but only one is chosen to do it the way it should be done, not just as a job or obligation but for happiness to occur.

144 agree | 124 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:11 AM MST on Tue., Nov. 6, 2007 re: "Slots alone won’t save horse racing"

examiner reader said:
What can others do to help out? I am at a loss with deciding what the right move is at this stage in the process.

175 agree | 141 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:41 AM MST on Tue., Nov. 6, 2007 re: "Slots alone won’t save horse racing"

RN said:
MO needs to do the math and quick.

174 agree | 121 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:18 AM MST on Tue., Nov. 6, 2007 re: "Slots alone won’t save horse racing"

A Ritter said:
Maybe I'm confused about the intent of the O'Malley revenue split of funds supplied by the intended slots program. O'Malley intends to give up to 100 million for racing purses and to breeders and another 40 million to the "Racetrack Renewal Fund." Recently MEC bought Laurel Racetrack and Pimlico, to add to their ownership of 9 other racetracks. This Canadian owned company also owns 3 tracks that are attached to casino operations. My question is; When did we get into the business of bailing out corporations that are clearly making money? If their investment was so bad do you think they would have bought both tracks for a mere 18.3 million? Now our Governor wants to "invest" 40 million more to encourage them to stay here? I understand The Preakness brings in millions in revenue to the state, but since when should we line the pockets of a Canadian firm as a payoff to make them stay here?

156 agree | 148 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:24 AM MST on Wed., Oct. 17, 2007 re: "Maryland Million brings in fans, dollars"

wmcorrow said:
The Maryland Million may have attained record attendance and amount wagered, but was the event profitable? Meaning, did takeout and signal fees cover the six-figure purses on the race card. Do the math, and you will find that the Maryland Million was a financial disaster.

145 agree | 178 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:13 PM MST on Wed., Sep. 26, 2007 re: "Same horse, different jockey at Pimlico"

RN said:
To Doc: I must admit that an apology is due.....for the past Gov. Lets be fair.....you think that I do not know this "You are trying to save an industry that has been raped by owners, and is suffering financially." I know the risk involved. Slots are fun, exciting, and profitable in their own way. We all have issues, some worse then others, but everyone is not affected by being exposed to slots. Your thinking about slots is based on past bad experiences from those who didn't know how to love.....the game. You can't make someone love.......slots and you can't push it on them, so it is better to just leave......the slots alone. However, I decided that I want to take the gamble. At the end of the day, everyone takes responsibility for their own decisions when taking a risk. Aside from what you and others think I say it is worth it, even with all the risks.

206 agree | 222 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:12 AM MST on Wed., Sep. 26, 2007 re: "Same horse, different jockey at Pimlico"

Examiner Reader said:
Doc: What's your point?

199 agree | 160 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:48 AM MST on Wed., Sep. 26, 2007 re: "Same horse, different jockey at Pimlico"

DOC said:
Unfortunately, The Governor does not have all of the information needed to make a decision like this. However, looks like he has jumped, and he won't change his mind now. Sooooooo......Don't give MJC a billion dollar paycheck, please. Make it fair, give everyone a chance to own a Slots Emporium. And most of all don't put all the slot operations in Race Tracks. You are trying to save an industry that has been raped by owners, and is suffering financially. Would you reward a criminal with money, when there were too many criminals on the street. and the criminals could no longer make a living?

185 agree | 182 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:40 PM MST on Tue., Sep. 25, 2007 re: "Same horse, different jockey at Pimlico"

Examiner Reader said:
"We’re losing population to Delaware and West Virginia, as people leave Maryland to get away from me, Franchot, Baltimore city, and--most of all-- O'Malley," Miller said.

168 agree | 173 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:57 AM MST on Mon., May. 14, 2007 re: "Pimlico losing lead in horse racing"

Examiner Reader said:
bring in the slots!

280 agree | 253 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:14 AM MST on Mon., May. 14, 2007 re: "Pimlico no longer has lead in Md. horse racing"

PC said:
What about a comparison of the number of racing days at both tracks. Laurel's numbers are higher because they run many more days than Pimlico. A major point that makes most of this story inaccurate.

266 agree | 682 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:59 AM MST on Mon., May. 14, 2007 re: "Pimlico no longer has lead in Md. horse racing"

Pimlico Sucks said:
Hmmm, lets see... -Drive to bad neighborhood -Pay $ to park -Pay $ for admission -Pay $ for program Fix this dead industry of get rid of it....

285 agree | 246 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement