Commentary - Don't expect a course change in the Virginia Senate
Article History
There are updates to this article.

WASHINGTON (Map, News) -  Not more than six years ago it seemed as if the Democrats in the Virginia General Assembly were on the edge of political oblivion. They had were at their lowest level ever in the State Senate and held an anemic 34 seats in the 100 member House of Delegates.

Save for making speeches, their influence in the House was next to nil and the same, at least in the early part of the decade, was true in the Senate. But like the GOP when it was in the minority the Democrats devised a simple comeback strategy. They focused their limited resources on specific races, picked up a few seats in the House, and at the same time added a couple of senate seats to their total.

But most of all, they waited for an opportunity when the state's changing demographics and the mood of the electorate would favor a comeback. This year their time might have arrived. The Democrats, along with hoping for some modest gains in the House, have decided that they have a real shot at taking the Senate.

They feel that a combination of changing demographics, particularly in Northern Virginia, strong candidates, lots of money, and a generally favorable year for Democrats gives them the edge.

Its likely that they're right, they may get their majority, but before anyone starts predicting major changes in the Senate's direction, it might be wise to take a deep breath and consider that for the most part, the state's political dynamic, isn't likely to change that much. The same moderate coalition, just with a few new members and a mildly different tilt, will still be in charge of the Senate.

However, no one is taking this election lightly. The GOP knows that a loss of the upper chamber would be a major blow.

The formula for a Democratic takeover requires at least two, and ideally three, major wins in Fairfax County. Fairfax, particularly during the past few years, has been trending heavily towards the Democrats. So much so, that Republican State Senators, last elected in 2003, are starting to feel like an endangered species.

However, the magic number the Democrats need to get a majority is four. If they win all of the vulnerable Fairfax seats, they still need to find the rest somewhere else. There is a long shot hope that they may get the seat of retiring Senator Russ Potts in the Winchester area, but that's a stretch.

That region is solidly Republican. They have better prospects in Hampton Roads, particularly for the Seat Senator Marty Williams lost in the primary. Republican Tricia Stall's harsh ant-tax stand may be too much for an area desperate for transportation money. John Chichester's old seat is also in play and that's considered a toss up.

It's possible under several scenarios that the Democrats may get control of the Senate. It will be body blow to the Republicans and the Democrats will be guaranteed a seat at the table when it comes time to negotiate the district boundary redrawing. But, at the risk of annoying the hard core party activists, the outcome of this election probably won't produce any serious change in the Senate's direction.

Even with a new majority in charge, the margin of difference between the two parties is going to be close. It may even be a tie. This means that more often than not the same coalition of moderate Republicans and Democrats will be in control.

If the Democrats win, the chamber may lean a little bit more to the left than it did before, but probably not that much. What's more, the impasses with the House, which will continue to be more conservative than the Senate, even if the GOP hangs on to the majority, will likely continue.

What this means is that when the legislature reconvenes in January it may not seem like much has changed.

Examiner contributor David Kerr is an Alexandria resident.


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

3:08 PM MST on Tue., Mar. 25, 2008 re: "Is the welcome mat really welcome?"

Examiner Reader said:
Hey to all reactionary idiots: how about you move NORTH of the mexican border? You know, the one that runs through 2 california, along n mexico and arizona, and down throu east texas? and lets not forget the hispanic carribean nation on florida. how is it puerto rico is "u.s." but other central americans are "illegals"?

2 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

4:53 PM MST on Fri., Feb. 8, 2008 re: "Quin-essential Cases: Immunity Request Is No Phone-y Plea"

dan of steele said:
So in simple terms, the republican stance is that telecoms are to be allowed to break the law without consequence and that the government should be allowed to continue to spy on us without a warrant. all the crap about terrorists is just smoke....right?

88 agree | 84 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:51 AM MST on Mon., Jan. 28, 2008 re: "Under Real ID, privacy will be nonexistent"

lorin mccann said:
Wonder what happends when the computer goes down???

101 agree | 79 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:13 PM MST on Sun., Jan. 27, 2008 re: "Under Real ID, privacy will be nonexistent"

Examiner Reader said:
Anyone who understands how government operates can foresee how REAL ID will be used against law-abiding citizens instead of terrorists. Recall that the Social Security Number was never intended to be used as an all-purpose identifier. The Federal income tax was originally going to apply only to the super-rich, and take less than 10 percent. Give government an inch and they take a mile. Ms. Scarborough has it exactly right. The government scares people and claims it needs this new infringement on privacy to fight the trrists, but eventually the REAL ID will be used to, as she says, "ground" adults over child support or library fines. That sounds like Orwellian hell to me. Did we really fight a World War against the Nazis, and a Cold War against the Soviets, only to adopt the kind of police-state people control mechanism that made us hate and fear totalitarian societies? Frankly, that scares me a lot more than the slim possibility of terrorism.

106 agree | 71 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:14 AM MST on Sat., Jan. 26, 2008 re: "Under Real ID, privacy will be nonexistent"

Examiner Reader said:
I totally agree with this article. History keeps repeating itself. Having to show papers or be tracked is against everything America stands for - individual rights and liberties.

102 agree | 65 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:44 PM MST on Thu., Jan. 24, 2008 re: "Under Real ID, privacy will be nonexistent"

Examiner Reader said:
With IHS (Intelligent Highway System) your current RFID drivers license and RFID inspection stickers are read as you drive down the highways. Watch for two hexagons cut into each line like at stop lights and a metal box usually on a pole at the side of the road. They have fiber, telephone and radio relay of data.

106 agree | 74 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:49 PM MST on Thu., Jan. 24, 2008 re: "Under Real ID, privacy will be nonexistent"

Examiner Reader said:
I totally agree with this article...I'm glad to see this info. being disseminated in mainstream venues. As for "tired's" rant, this law should be examined in a historical context and to minimize the similarities that exist between the beginnings of Nazi Germany and what is going on now is naive at best, fascist propaganda at worst.

93 agree | 85 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:22 PM MST on Tue., Jan. 22, 2008 re: "Under Real ID, privacy will be nonexistent"

USN said:
Welcome to Amerika?? That's about as far as I got with your article. It’s childish and it’s usually leftists who do this.

97 agree | 107 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:17 PM MST on Tue., Jan. 22, 2008 re: "Under Real ID, privacy will be nonexistent"

TERRY AGHEE said:
And tell us Melanie, just how are you going to keep our children and our grandkids safe? What exactly is your plan? You see to think that there is absolutely no difficulty with terrorists anymore - does that mean that you will just forget about illegal aliens and armed therrorists? Will you sleep well now?

95 agree | 77 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:30 PM MST on Mon., Jan. 21, 2008 re: "Under Real ID, privacy will be nonexistent"

Tired of all the ACLU lies about REAL ID said:
Your columnist either hasn't done her homework (read the final Rule or the Driver Privacy Protection Act--fed. law) or she's bought into that bunch of lies being circulated by the ACLU. REAL ID will require background checks on all DMV employees-getting rid of the bad apples up front will increase privacy protections, not decrease them.And as for the info. encoded on the mag stripe/barcode--check your facts,MD and a lot of other states do that already.The info is the same as on the face of the DL-its a security feature against tampering.It's no diff. than copying the info off the front of a DL-same info. Anyone who has a commercial DL knows the DMV already checks to see if you have a CDL in any other state. It's a pointer system--what REAL ID will have--not an open database. REAL ID is far from perfect but it's not the privacy monster the ACLU wants us to believe.Oh, & fed. law lets states suspend DLs of deadbeats who don't pay child support. Do you have a problem w/that too, Mel

102 agree | 89 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:06 PM MST on Mon., Jan. 21, 2008 re: "Under Real ID, privacy will be nonexistent"

David of NM said:
What a great article. It is somewhat encouraging to me that more people seem to be getting wise to the dangerous REAL ID Act. The writer wrote mostly about privacy,security and expansion concerns and not so much about cost concerns. The real problems with REAL ID are not cost related. I keep writing my representatives, asking for repeal, but I get a canned Republican National Committee instead. The Republicans are largely the drivers of REAL ID. Rep. Sensenbrenner R-WI seized on the 9/11 Commission report that called for more secure licenses. He authored the abomination called the REAL ID Act of 2005 so he could come out of obscurity and be a legislative superstar. Today, Sensenbrenner refers to REAL ID as "his baby". DIGIMARC Corp. of Oregon has contributed much money to be used for grants to States for the purpose of softening opposition to REAL ID. DIGIMARC, a worldwide company selling National ID card making equipment and related services stands to make millions off REAL ID

115 agree | 79 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:19 PM MST on Tue., Nov. 13, 2007 re: "Is the welcome mat really welcome?"

an irate citizen because of an irate citizen said:
Yeah this country was founded by immigrants, and the only reason why there is such an outcry to stop it, is because now we're getting the kind we don't want. The kind with brown skin. Stolen social security benefits? I don't think so. If an immigrant used a stolen social security number to get a job, they're paying taxes too and rarely if ever redeem benefits for fear of getting caught. Cockroaches (usually a racial slur),shoot to kill? Wow,let me know how the next klan meeting goes.

187 agree | 177 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:53 PM MST on Sun., Nov. 4, 2007 re: "Is the welcome mat really welcome?"

reader said:
"even the best national policies won't work if local governments undermine them. And for years, some governments have been doing all they could to thwart federal immigration policy." - No duh...

179 agree | 210 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:51 AM MST on Sat., Nov. 3, 2007 re: "Is the welcome mat really welcome?"

An Irate Citizen said:
This Country was started by immigrants from the United Kingdom and Europe and has subsequently always welcomed legal immigration. However, in our recent history we have been beseiged by people who simply crawl over our borders like cockroaches. These borders should be patrolled by soldiers who have the authority to shoot to kill anyone who tries to enter the country illegally. Also those who are here and who are not here legally should be rounded up and immediately deported. No "ifs, ands or buts" about it. Amongst other things, the illegals are stealing our social security benefits and ruining our health care system. It can not continue. I plead with all of you to contact your representatives in Congress and any presidential candidate you're supporting and tell them you want action and that you want action now. Please do this today if you love your family and you love your country.

209 agree | 223 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:46 PM MST on Fri., Aug. 10, 2007 re: "Is it "pay for play" time in Spitzer's New York?"

Examiner Reader said:
When Spitzer was AG of New York he carefully target his prosecutions of Wall Street and the Insurance industry. Those not targeted soon got the message that they were to pay up campaign contributions or else. Spitzer ran the New York AG's office like a gangster and it seems he runs the governor's office like a gangster too.

271 agree | 285 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:44 PM MST on Fri., Aug. 10, 2007 re: "Is it "pay for play" time in Spitzer's New York?"

Examiner Reader said:
FWIW, the Neighborhood Preservation PAF is the rent stabilized apartment owners PAC many of whom *hate* Spitzer.

265 agree | 273 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.22 seconds)