Multimedia News

Notables who have lost children
6 photos
John Travolta's 16-year-old son Jett died Jan...
New Year, New You
6 photos
Oprah regrets her weight gain over the past y...
Hopman Cup highlights
6 photos
Russia's Dinara Safina returns a shot against...
Ski jumping at its finest
6 photos
Ski jumper Nicolas Mayer from France flies du...
Virginia Tech beats Cincinnati in Orange Bowl
6 photos
Virginia Tech's Darren Evans (32) celebrates ...

Supervisors ask for halt on foreclosures

Oct 31, 2007 3:00 AM (434 days ago) by Tamara Barak, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: San Mateo County
Residents listen to the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors talk 
about subprime loans.
(Mike Koozmin/Special to The Examiner)
Residents listen to the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors talk about subprime loans.
San Mateo County (Map, News) - Attempting to stem the tide of foreclosures, San Mateo County’s Board of Supervisors on Tuesday passed a resolution calling on subprime lenders to halt foreclosures for three months while renegotiating with their customers.

The measure’s provisions are voluntary and follow in the footsteps of the South San Francisco City Council, which passed a similar resolution last month.

Board President Rose Jacobs Gibson, who proposed the resolution, cited the 1.2 million foreclosures filed nationwide last year and the 142,426 foreclosures filed statewide in 1996 — an increase of 131 percent from the previous year in California. In April of this year, the number of foreclosure filings in San Mateo County was more than six times greater than the previous year at the same time, according to county officials.

“Subprime loans have turned the dreams of home ownership into nightmares,” Jacobs Gibson said.

This story continues below
Advertisement

Estela Baldovinos told supervisors she is four months overdue on the mortgage payments on her South San Francisco home. Baldovinos, a housecleaner, and her husband, a handyman, bought the $675,000 home in 2004. With monthly payments of $2,700 and 6.5 percent interest on their loan, the Baldovinos and their nine children lived comfortably.

After two years, however, the Baldovinos’ monthly payments shot up to $8,200 per month at 12 percent interest. Baldovinos says that at the time she bought her house, her lending agent assured her that her payments would go down, not up. The nonprofit group Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now is currently negotiating on her behalf and foreclosure proceedings have been put on hold.

“It’s very stressful. We can’t concentrate on our personal life at all,” Baldovinos said.

Supervisor Adrienne Tissier said Baldovinos’ story is not uncommon.

“A lot of what’s in the [loan] document is different than what you’re being told by the lender,” she said. “This is a time to take a closer look at the lenders and the real estate agents. They extended the market to people who truly couldn’t afford the homes.”

Supervisors said they hope the moratorium will allow homeowners facing foreclosure to renegotiate the terms of their loans.

A report released last week by ACORN examines the neighborhood impact of subprime lending and foreclosures.

The report cites a study by researchers at Georgia Tech and Woodstock that found that an increase in the foreclosure rate to about 2.8 foreclosures for every 100 owner-occupied properties in one year corresponds to an increase of violent crime of approximately 6.8 percent.

The cost of likely foreclosures

617 number of high-cost loans made in 2006 in the San Francisco-San Mateo County area likely to go into foreclosure.

$4,441,666 cost to individual homeowners in foreclosure

$124,868,079 cost to lenders and investors

$11,861,098 cost to local government

$71,255,420 cost in lowered home values of neighbors

Total cost to all stakeholders: $210 million

- Sources: Acorn, The Center for Responsible Lending

tbarak@examiner.com

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

3:30 PM MST on Wed., Oct. 31, 2007 re: "Supervisors ask for halt on foreclosures"

Examiner Reader said:
So we reward fiscally irresponsible behavior by mitigating the results. Once the monster is created it needs to be regularly fed.

58 agree | 46 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Advertisement