
|
Los Angeles City Guides
|
Internal documents shine new light on the inner workings of Google vis-a-vis its relationship with Moveon.org.
What do you think about the new questions being raised about the Google, Moveon.org relationship?
Sound off and add your voice to a local daily discussion. Vote in our poll, then just scroll to the comment box below, tell us what you think and click "Send." Read and respond to other examiNation questions.
Not ranked |
EMAIL ME THIS STORY |
|
Sports
Business |
Real Estate Family Movies and Books Venues, Sports and Music Concerts, Artists and Tickets Be Inspired - Quotes and Stories |
Comments from Examiner Readers
11:11 AM MST on Sat., Oct. 27, 2007 re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about the new questions being raised about the Google, Moveon.org relationship?"
Report as inappropriate
8:46 AM MST on Fri., Oct. 26, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about the new questions being raised about the Google, Moveon.org relationship?"
Report as inappropriate
3:11 PM MST on Thu., Oct. 25, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about the new questions being raised about the Google, Moveon.org relationship?"
Report as inappropriate
1:58 PM MST on Thu., Oct. 25, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about the new questions being raised about the Google, Moveon.org relationship?"
Report as inappropriate
1:00 PM MST on Thu., Oct. 25, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about the new questions being raised about the Google, Moveon.org relationship?"
Report as inappropriate
12:17 PM MST on Thu., Oct. 25, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about the new questions being raised about the Google, Moveon.org relationship?"
Report as inappropriate
10:23 AM MST on Thu., Oct. 25, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about the new questions being raised about the Google, Moveon.org relationship?"
Report as inappropriate
9:28 AM MST on Thu., Oct. 25, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about the new questions being raised about the Google, Moveon.org relationship?"
Report as inappropriate
9:26 AM MST on Thu., Oct. 25, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about the new questions being raised about the Google, Moveon.org relationship?"
Report as inappropriate
9:12 AM MST on Thu., Oct. 25, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about the new questions being raised about the Google, Moveon.org relationship?"
Report as inappropriate
1:18 PM MST on Fri., Aug. 24, 2007
re: "examiNation SF: How do you feel about people talking on cell phones while driving?"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
Of course MoveOn.org was attempting to supress free speach, just as Google does in China. Both groups are totalitarian 'movements' working to make free people slaves of the State.
79 agree | 92 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Were it not for free speech guaranteed to every man woman and child under the First Amendment, MoveOn would never have been able to run their Petraeus ad. So it was utterly hypocritical and power mongering that they decided to take the same right away from others who would dare to criticize them. We have to be careful of these big groups with lots of lawyers who are all too happy to squelch the freedoms of the individual. This isn't much ado about nothing. They acted irrespective of the our constitutional rights. They deserve to be sued.
104 agree | 96 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Marshall McLuhan acolyte said:
all media has bias, as we all have bias. Anyone who believes that news groups, media stations, or any other business does not have any political leanings is totally naive.I love google because of their product line, and regardless of if you like them , they could and do shape the popular opinion. Being a dicordian by nature, The fact that a corporation wields its power in such a way is heartening and fascinating. what I find amazing is that anyone is surprised by this
91 agree | 110 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
To the commenter who said "This is much to do about nothing! Slow news day?" - forgive me for being impertinent, but the phrase you're after is "...much ado about nothing..." Any time media bias and intentional control of media can be proven, in my opinion that isn't much ado about nothing. We need to make it plain that unless a media group calls itself an opinion group, bias and deliberate suppression of dissenting ideas isn't appropriate. I don't support any form of terrorism. This smacks of corporate terrorism to me.
99 agree | 82 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I also do not support google. I try to avoid google search engines/products as much as possible.
117 agree | 88 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Move on needs to do just that....go away
124 agree | 73 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Where is all the wailing and gnashing of teeth from the "Freedom of Speech" crowd now, oh silly me, this doesen't fit the paradigm; "Freedom of Speech" only applies to the those views that damage our country. Please keep up the good work of shining light in dark conners.
116 agree | 82 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
reader said:
This has been building up for quite some time now and I am glad examiner is still doggedly pursuing this when others have simply stopped showing interest in this controversial matter.
125 agree | 90 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
reader said:
The relationship is too cozy for my tastes.
98 agree | 85 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
This is much to do about nothing! Slow news day?
117 agree | 79 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Reader said:
Almost as bad a seeing women put on makeup while driving
54 agree | 66 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree