Examiner.com // 59 mins ago
Examiner.com // 2 hrs 5 mins ago
ABC7.com // 2 hrs 44 mins ago
Los Angeles Times // 3 hrs ago
Los Angeles Times // 3 hrs ago
Los Angeles Times // 3 hrs ago
Los Angeles Times // 3 hrs ago
Los Angeles Times // 3 hrs ago
ABC7.com // 3 hrs ago
CBS2-KCAL // 3 hrs ago
 
   
Supe shakes up booze ban exemption
Article History
There are updates to this article.
The City is considering changes to a ban on alcohol sales at new grocery stores.
(Examiner file photo)
The City is considering changes to a ban on alcohol sales at new grocery stores.

SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - Hoping to slow the exodus of big-name grocery stores from San Francisco while also encouraging them to open shop in poor neighborhoods, The City is considering altering restrictions on alcohol sales for new stores.

In 2004, The City froze alcohol sales in five neighborhoods — including parts of the Tenderloin, Bayview-Hunters Point, the Mission and the upper and lower Haight areas — as the number of liquor stores and bars in those areas were contributing to drug trafficking, public drunkenness and other safety issues, officials said.

As a result, any new establishments requiring liquor permits — including grocery stores — have been unable to open in those neighborhoods. Big-name grocery stores such as Albertsons and Cala Foods have also closed shop in The City over the last two years, leaving some residents without a local grocery store.

In May, Supervisor Michela Alioto-Pier introduced legislation that would exempt grocery stores larger than 5,000 square feet from the ban.

While the measure has attracted overwhelming support from the San Francisco Department of Public Health and service agencies that represent the neighborhoods involved, some have said the measure is a loophole to allow more alcohol sales in the communities where alcoholism is rampant.

“The Tenderloin desperately needs a grocery store, but it doesn’t need any more liquor licenses,” said Earl Rogers, of the San Francisco Rescue Mission.

To address the concerns, Supervisor Gerardo Sandoval on Monday introduced an amendment to Alioto-Pier’s proposed measure that would make it illegal for any new grocery stores to sell fortified wines, including malt beverages with more than 5.7 percent alcohol and wines with more than 15 percent alcohol.

Under the amendment, which will be discussed at a public hearing next week, the stores would also be prohibited from selling alcohol in containers smaller than 600 milligrams, such as the small liquor bottles sold on airplanes.

“The original restrictions in commercial areas were meant to prevent acceleration of alcoholism in blighted communities,” Sandoval said. “But these communities suffer from the lack of quality shopping. I think we’re largely addressing the social illnesses and gaining the economic benefit.”

arocha@examiner.com

Voice your opinion and vote in our poll at examiNation SF: What do you think of lifting the inner city booze ban for large grocery stores?


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

12:40 PM MST on Tue., Oct. 23, 2007 re: "Supe shakes up booze ban exemption"

Bleeding Heart Lib said:
The problem is not booze or drugs. The problem is the kind of undesireable people who live there who have a tendency to abuse drugs and alcohol. Remove them and you remove the problem. I think SF should round up all the undesirable winos and ship them to Treasure Island for a 1 year drug, alcohol, and lifestyle self-esteem program. The result is an increase of 10% in tourism dollars because the previous tourists won't warn new tourists of the all dirty winos.

142 agree | 141 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

12:12 PM MST on Tue., Oct. 23, 2007 re: "Supe shakes up booze ban exemption"

homer j. simpsoy said:
once again unintended consequences of "quality of life" legislation pushed by the republicans in this town backfire on honest businesspeople. Duh.

125 agree | 127 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:41 AM MST on Tue., Oct. 23, 2007 re: "S.F. supe shakes up booze ban exemption"

Examiner Reader said:
Will someone tell tell that stupid supervisor that wine and liquor sold in small sizes isn't the problem, it's the drugs ingested by the subject that is the problem.

124 agree | 118 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.13 seconds)