Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
On Monday, during the Board of Supervisors Land Use Committee, San Francisco Fire Marshall Barbara Schultheis announced that the air-supply system requirement would be left in the fire code in addition to fire-resistant elevators, which carry firefighters and equipment, including oxygen tanks, to the upper floors of tall buildings.
On Aug. 23, the San Francisco Fire Commission passed a new version of the fire code that removed the requirement for Rescue Air — which provides an air supply for firefighters working in high-rises to refill their oxygen tanks without having to go all the way downstairs — and replaced it with the fire-resistant elevators. The version drew the ire of Firefighters Local 798, whose members said some sort of air supply is necessary in high-rise buildings.
Schultheis said she did not expect such an emotional reaction to the changes, as an air-supply system has never been used in San Francisco. The first system, in fact, was installed this year in a high-rise building on Fillmore Street, she said.
The City is updating its fire codes to comply with state codes, which are updated every three years, and is including measures that will soon be highly relevant with a host of new high-rises coming to San Francisco in the next few years, including towers at the Transbay Terminal at First and Mission streets and Treasure Island.



Comments from Examiner Readers
11:12 PM MST on Tue., Sep. 4, 2007 re: "Does new fire code give S.F. any breathing room?"
Report as inappropriate
10:29 PM MST on Tue., Sep. 4, 2007
re: "Does new fire code give S.F. any breathing room?"
Report as inappropriate
D. Ch'an-Moriwaki said:
Yes, yes, I know the article as it actually appears in the hardcopy version is accessible online as a PDF file. But that's a lot of hassle -- opening, loading each page, zooming-in each PDF page before it can be readable, scrolling left to right, left to right . . . on and on, etc. Some computers are slow-running machines despite broadband connections. Who has time for all that nonsnese? Most readers would prefer the text immediately visible and readable in one pass, such as on this webpage's format, BUT ALSO with the pix. Please tell the boss. Also, with much appreciation, thank you, Examiner, for providing us the daily news at no charge. A grateful readership looks forward daily to your news.
168 agree | 167 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
D. Ch'an-Moriwaki said:
It's a great disappointment that your online articles omit the photos that accompany the print version in the hard-copy daily newspaper. In today's media-ebiquitous world, it doesn't make any sense that a news publisher brings us only the words. That makes for very one-dimensional informing. Your company thus brings us FLAT news when it's presented online.
181 agree | 149 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree