Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
BALTIMORE (Map, News) - The federal government wants to test college students to ensure universities do a good job teaching, not to create a higher-education equivalent of the controversial No Child Left Behind Act, a Bush aide told school administrators and professors Monday.
“We need to evaluate colleges, not based on reputations but performance outcomes,” Diane Auer Jones, assistant secretary for post-secondary education, said at an annual conference of the Coalition of Urban and Metropolitan Universities in Baltimore.
“We need to be clearer about our universities’ strengths and weaknesses. We are not taking No Child Left Behind to college.”
Some primary and secondary teachers view NCLB testing as an edict that monopolizes their time and detracts from teaching and learning.
University officials worry that the secretary of education’s Commission on the Future of Higher Education will propose similar testing at colleges.
While no formal plans have been adopted, the commission’s chairman, Charles Miller, has expressed support for the Collegiate Learning Assessment, an exam students in the University of Texas system must take.
Mandating a common test for college students is a one-size-fits-all measurement that fails to consider the nation’s wide variety of schools, critics say.
“It really misses the complexity of American higher education,” said Tony Pals, spokesman for the National Association of Independent Colleges and Universities.
“How do you compare Harvard with a rabbinical school or a performing arts school? Our association does not oppose a choice by universities to use learning measures, but we do oppose the prescription. It should be up to each individual institution to determine how they gauge their students’ learning.”
Jones, a Baltimore County resident, said the Education Department solicited suggestions for how schools can better collect information about student performance and share it with the public.
“We’re not saying everyone choose the same test,” she said.
Some, for instance, might use the Graduate Record Examinations, Jones said, while others might choose portfolios of work or other measures.
Educators at the conference, including Barbara Hewins-Maroney, a professor at the University of Nebraska at Omaha, continued to have questions about increased accountability at colleges.
If each school uses a different standard, she asked, what comparisons could be made?
kvolkmann@baltimoreexaminer.com



Comments from Examiner Readers
6:23 AM MST on Wed., Mar. 19, 2008 re: "National school mandates may be overhauled in Maryland"
Report as inappropriate
5:30 AM MST on Mon., Aug. 20, 2007
re: "No Child enforcement varies by state"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
Nancy Grasmick is wrong. Struggling schools that have made progress but are still failing must be forced to rehire staff or bring in private operators! Less just plays to the NEA.
2 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Changes in the law should include class size, not school size, studies show higher averages and test scores with fewer students per class, not school size! Please do an study article on class size and forward to Congress.
127 agree | 142 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree