<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
			<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/css/rss2.xsl"?>

			<rss version="2.0">
			<channel>
			<title>SF Environmental Policy Examiner</title>
			<link>http://www.examiner.com/x-9111-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner?cid=exrss-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner</link>
			<description></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 02:17:05 -0700</pubDate>
			<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 18:22:56 -0700</lastBuildDate>
			<generator>BlogCFC</generator>
			<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
			<managingEditor></managingEditor>
			<webMaster></webMaster>
			
			
			
			
			
			
			<item>
				<title>Back to green technologies that work</title>				
				<link>http://www.examiner.com/x-9111-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner~y2009m11d7-Back-to-green-technologies-that-work?cid=exrss-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner</link>
				<description>
				
				
				
	Malcolm Drake, frequent commenter (and voice of reason) here, has often posted on his experiences with solar power. He lives in southern Oregon (my two years in Portland were not blessed overly much by sun, but the southern part of the state is qu...
				
				
				</description>
				
				<category>Liberal Skeptic</category>
				
				<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 18:22:56 -0700</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.examiner.com/x-9111-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner~y2009m11d7-Back-to-green-technologies-that-work?cid=exrss-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner</guid>
				
			</item>
			
		 	
			
			
			
			<item>
				<title>Global warming survey Part 3: More about skeptics</title>				
				<link>http://www.examiner.com/x-9111-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner~y2009m11d5-Global-warming-survey-Part-3-More-about-skeptics?cid=exrss-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner</link>
				<description>
				
				
				
	Key finding: 80% of skeptics disapprove of any geoengineering methods offered as a solution to global warming.

	We&amp;#39;re taking a good long look at global warming skeptics because so many of them took part in our survey. We&amp;#39;ll compare them...
				
				
				</description>
				
				<category>Liberal Skeptic</category>
				
				<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:44:39 -0700</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.examiner.com/x-9111-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner~y2009m11d5-Global-warming-survey-Part-3-More-about-skeptics?cid=exrss-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner</guid>
				
			</item>
			
		 	
			
			
			
			<item>
				<title>Global warming survey--Part 2, portrait of a global warming skeptic</title>				
				<link>http://www.examiner.com/x-9111-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner~y2009m11d4-Global-warming-surveyPart-2-portrait-of-a-global-warming-skeptic?cid=exrss-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner</link>
				<description>
				
				
				
	Update: I have moved the key finding up to the top, as I think it&amp;#39;s actually quite important (and it was the principal objective of the survey in the first place.)

	Key Finding
	
	Skeptics are not monolithic, and they are not diametricall...
				
				
				</description>
				
				<category>Liberal Skeptic</category>
				
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:42:52 -0700</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.examiner.com/x-9111-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner~y2009m11d4-Global-warming-surveyPart-2-portrait-of-a-global-warming-skeptic?cid=exrss-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner</guid>
				
			</item>
			
		 	
			
			
			
			<item>
				<title>Global warming survey results: Part 1</title>				
				<link>http://www.examiner.com/x-9111-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner~y2009m11d3-Global-warming-survey-results-Part-1?cid=exrss-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner</link>
				<description>
				
				
				
	Okay, so here we go. I am now beginning analysis on a quantitative survey of 3,300 completed surveys gathered over a 4-day period from last Friday through today.

	Part 2 of the analysis can be found here.

	These preliminary tidbits are just ...
				
				
				</description>
				
				<category>Liberal Skeptic</category>
				
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 22:50:38 -0700</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.examiner.com/x-9111-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner~y2009m11d3-Global-warming-survey-results-Part-1?cid=exrss-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner</guid>
				
			</item>
			
		 	
			
			
			
			<item>
				<title>More global warming blog wars</title>				
				<link>http://www.examiner.com/x-9111-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner~y2009m11d3-More-global-warming-blog-wars?cid=exrss-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner</link>
				<description>
				
				
				
	Those of you who are tired of seeing the bickering between the differing sides of the global warming debate might want to skip this--but others might be pleased to see that I have issues with people other than Joe Romm...

	This article is &amp;#39;...
				
				
				</description>
				
				<category>Liberal Skeptic</category>
				
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 12:03:08 -0700</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.examiner.com/x-9111-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner~y2009m11d3-More-global-warming-blog-wars?cid=exrss-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner</guid>
				
			</item>
			
		 	
			
			
			
			<item>
				<title>Climate survey update</title>				
				<link>http://www.examiner.com/x-9111-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner~y2009m11d2-Climate-survey-update?cid=exrss-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner</link>
				<description>
				
				
				
	Wow. That&amp;#39;s my first reaction to the responses we&amp;#39;ve seen so far to Examiner.com&amp;#39;s First Annual Global Warming Survey. Just--wow.

	In less than three days more than 3,000 of you have taken the time and made the effort to fill out th...
				
				
				</description>
				
				<category>Liberal Skeptic</category>
				
				<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:17:10 -0700</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.examiner.com/x-9111-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner~y2009m11d2-Climate-survey-update?cid=exrss-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner</guid>
				
			</item>
			
		 	
			
			
			
			<item>
				<title>Examiner.com&apos;s First Annual Survey on Global Warming</title>				
				<link>http://www.examiner.com/x-9111-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner~y2009m10d30-Examinercoms-First-Annual-Survey-on-Global-Warming?cid=exrss-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner</link>
				<description>
				
				
				
	&amp;nbsp;

	If you are tired of having everybody trying to tell you what you think, and especially if what you think isn&amp;#39;t what&amp;#39;s being reported, I heartily encourage you to take this survey. I will be doing the analysis for free and for fu...
				
				
				</description>
				
				<category>Liberal Skeptic</category>
				
				<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:36:08 -0700</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.examiner.com/x-9111-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner~y2009m10d30-Examinercoms-First-Annual-Survey-on-Global-Warming?cid=exrss-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner</guid>
				
			</item>
			
		 	
			
			
			
			<item>
				<title>Consensus on climate action in uncertain times</title>				
				<link>http://www.examiner.com/x-9111-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner~y2009m10d30-Consensus-on-climate-action-in-uncertain-times?cid=exrss-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner</link>
				<description>
				
				
				
	Welcome back to those of you who just finished the survey--if you haven&amp;#39;t taken it yet, go here and click on the link!

	The point I&amp;#39;m trying to clarify in this survey is not who your favorite climate blogger is. I really want to know if...
				
				
				</description>
				
				<category>Liberal Skeptic</category>
				
				<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:33:58 -0700</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.examiner.com/x-9111-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner~y2009m10d30-Consensus-on-climate-action-in-uncertain-times?cid=exrss-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner</guid>
				
			</item>
			
		 	
			
			
			
			<item>
				<title>Agreeing on one specific action regarding climate change</title>				
				<link>http://www.examiner.com/x-9111-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner~y2009m10d30-Agreeing-on-one-specific-action-regarding-climate-change?cid=exrss-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner</link>
				<description>
				
				
				
	I have on several occasions tried to get proponents and opponents of AGW (anthropogenic global warming) to agree on a limited course of action to address environmental issues including global warming.

	But I&amp;#39;m a bit hot-headed at times, and...
				
				
				</description>
				
				<category>Liberal Skeptic</category>
				
				<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 10:06:45 -0700</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.examiner.com/x-9111-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner~y2009m10d30-Agreeing-on-one-specific-action-regarding-climate-change?cid=exrss-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner</guid>
				
			</item>
			
		 	
			
			
			
			<item>
				<title>Should we prepare for or prevent global warming?</title>				
				<link>http://www.examiner.com/x-9111-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner~y2009m10d28-Should-we-prepare-for-or-prevent-global-warming?cid=exrss-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner</link>
				<description>
				
				
				
	The right answer to the question in the headline is obviously &amp;#39;both.&amp;#39;&amp;nbsp; I think we will do both, and I think it will work. But not before lots of painful discussions and numerous blog wars, of course.

	The headlines should really be...
				
				
				</description>
				
				<category>Liberal Skeptic</category>
				
				<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:33:20 -0700</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.examiner.com/x-9111-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner~y2009m10d28-Should-we-prepare-for-or-prevent-global-warming?cid=exrss-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner</guid>
				
			</item>
			
		 	
			
			
			
			<item>
				<title>By request--my beliefs on global warming</title>				
				<link>http://www.examiner.com/x-9111-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner~y2009m10d26-By-requestmy-beliefs-on-global-warming?cid=exrss-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner</link>
				<description>
				
				
				
	I&amp;#39;ve actually had three people ask me what I believe about global warming--I did a series some months ago, but I think my beliefs have evolved a bit since then, so here goes.

	But let&amp;#39;s do it differently this time--let&amp;#39;s get your op...
				
				
				</description>
				
				<category>Liberal Skeptic</category>
				
				<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:31:52 -0700</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.examiner.com/x-9111-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner~y2009m10d26-By-requestmy-beliefs-on-global-warming?cid=exrss-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner</guid>
				
			</item>
			
		 	
			
			
			
			<item>
				<title>The way the wind is blowing for global warming</title>				
				<link>http://www.examiner.com/x-9111-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner~y2009m10d24-The-way-the-wind-is-blowing-for-global-warming?cid=exrss-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner</link>
				<description>
				
				
				
	You can tell by choice of topic what&amp;#39;s happening in the global warming world.

	From the skeptical side, you see:

	
		On Watt&amp;#39;s Up With That,&amp;nbsp;a guest post by Bob Tisdale on ocean heat content that takes issue with James Hansen&amp;#...
				
				
				</description>
				
				<category>Liberal Skeptic</category>
				
				<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 18:47:40 -0700</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.examiner.com/x-9111-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner~y2009m10d24-The-way-the-wind-is-blowing-for-global-warming?cid=exrss-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner</guid>
				
			</item>
			
		 	
			
			
			
			<item>
				<title>It&apos;s what we don&apos;t know about global warming that bothers me</title>				
				<link>http://www.examiner.com/x-9111-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner~y2009m10d23-Its-what-we-dont-know-about-global-warming-that-bothers-me?cid=exrss-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner</link>
				<description>
				
				
				
	Over at Watt&amp;#39;s Up With That, there&amp;#39;s a post asking Al Gore where the hurricanes are. Some climate scientists have predicted for years that global warming would cause more and stronger tropical storms. We&amp;#39;re having a record low.

	It ...
				
				
				</description>
				
				<category>Liberal Skeptic</category>
				
				<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 22:52:41 -0700</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.examiner.com/x-9111-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner~y2009m10d23-Its-what-we-dont-know-about-global-warming-that-bothers-me?cid=exrss-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner</guid>
				
			</item>
			
		 	
			
			
			
			<item>
				<title>Where should global warming rank on our list of priorities?</title>				
				<link>http://www.examiner.com/x-9111-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner~y2009m10d22-Where-should-global-warming-rank-on-our-list-of-priorities?cid=exrss-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner</link>
				<description>
				
				
				
	That is the 64 dollar question. It may surprise some readers to find out that most of the websites that are being vilified as puppets of right wing oil conspiracies are actually run by people who believe in Global Warming. I certainly do. I try to...
				
				
				</description>
				
				<category>Liberal Skeptic</category>
				
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 22:45:52 -0700</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.examiner.com/x-9111-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner~y2009m10d22-Where-should-global-warming-rank-on-our-list-of-priorities?cid=exrss-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner</guid>
				
			</item>
			
		 	
			
			
			
			<item>
				<title>When Rush Limbaugh and other major media morons intrude on global warming discussions</title>				
				<link>http://www.examiner.com/x-9111-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner~y2009m10d20-When-Rush-Limbaugh-and-other-major-media-morons-intrude-on-global-warming-discussions?cid=exrss-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner</link>
				<description>
				
				
				
	Rush Limbaugh told New York Times reporter Andrew Revkin to kill himself today. Just another day in global warming idiocy.

	Yesterday, after I blasted Rush&amp;#39;s evil twin Joe Romm for saying similar stupid things, commenter Wolfgang asked why ...
				
				
				</description>
				
				<category>Liberal Skeptic</category>
				
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 19:06:56 -0700</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.examiner.com/x-9111-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner~y2009m10d20-When-Rush-Limbaugh-and-other-major-media-morons-intrude-on-global-warming-discussions?cid=exrss-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner</guid>
				
			</item>
			
		 	
			
			
			
			<item>
				<title>Distorting the global warming debate: How low can Joe Romm go?</title>				
				<link>http://www.examiner.com/x-9111-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner~y2009m10d19-Distorting-the-global-warming-debate-How-low-can-Joe-Romm-go?cid=exrss-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner</link>
				<description>
				
				
				
	Joe Romm runs the Climate Progress weblog, where he posts long pieces about how global warming will be much worse than anyone (including the IPCC) thinks and how we need to stop waiting for science to give us anything like facts or numbers and do ...
				
				
				</description>
				
				<category>Liberal Skeptic</category>
				
				<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:39:43 -0700</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.examiner.com/x-9111-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner~y2009m10d19-Distorting-the-global-warming-debate-How-low-can-Joe-Romm-go?cid=exrss-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner</guid>
				
			</item>
			
		 	
			
			
			
			<item>
				<title>The ups and downs of global warming over time</title>				
				<link>http://www.examiner.com/x-9111-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner~y2009m10d17-The-ups-and-downs-of-global-warming-over-time?cid=exrss-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner</link>
				<description>
				
				
				
	While we&amp;#39;re fussing and feuding over temperature rises and falls over the past decade, some people think it&amp;#39;s better to look at things over a longer period of time. Bill Illis has written a guest post over at Watt&amp;#39;s Up With That, a ske...
				
				
				</description>
				
				<category>Liberal Skeptic</category>
				
				<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 11:26:10 -0700</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.examiner.com/x-9111-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner~y2009m10d17-The-ups-and-downs-of-global-warming-over-time?cid=exrss-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner</guid>
				
			</item>
			
		 	
			
			
			
			<item>
				<title>Global warming&apos;s rocky road to Copenhagen</title>				
				<link>http://www.examiner.com/x-9111-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner~y2009m10d15-Global-warmings-rocky-road-to-Copenhagen?cid=exrss-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner</link>
				<description>
				
				
				I suppose it&apos;s possible that those who are committed to drastic and dramatic action on climate change will pretend that most of 2009 didn&apos;t happen. The world leaders, scientists and lobbyists from environmental organisations and their evil cousins, t...
				
				
				</description>
				
				<category>Liberal Skeptic</category>
				
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:23:06 -0700</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.examiner.com/x-9111-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner~y2009m10d15-Global-warmings-rocky-road-to-Copenhagen?cid=exrss-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner</guid>
				
			</item>
			
		 	
			
			
			
			<item>
				<title>What will be the effects of moderate global warming?</title>				
				<link>http://www.examiner.com/x-9111-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner~y2009m10d14-What-will-be-the-effects-of-moderate-global-warming?cid=exrss-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner</link>
				<description>
				
				
				I believe that global warming will increase average temperatures by about 2 degrees Celsius over the course of this century. But what will that mean in effect? Most of the predictions seem to come from people with a political stake in the outcome, an...
				
				
				</description>
				
				<category>Liberal Skeptic</category>
				
				<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:09:35 -0700</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.examiner.com/x-9111-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner~y2009m10d14-What-will-be-the-effects-of-moderate-global-warming?cid=exrss-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner</guid>
				
			</item>
			
		 	
			
			
			
			<item>
				<title>First annual award for global warming sanity</title>				
				<link>http://www.examiner.com/x-9111-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner~y2009m10d12-First-annual-award-for-global-warming-sanity?cid=exrss-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner</link>
				<description>
				
				
				Those who&apos;ve visited this space over the past two days already know that Joe Romm of Climate Progress and I have $1,000 wagered on average temperatures over the next decade.I initially said that I would give any winnings to a charity nominated by my ...
				
				
				</description>
				
				<category>Liberal Skeptic</category>
				
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 23:46:05 -0700</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.examiner.com/x-9111-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner~y2009m10d12-First-annual-award-for-global-warming-sanity?cid=exrss-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner</guid>
				
			</item>
			
		 	
			</channel></rss>